Advertisement
Research Article|Articles in Press

Adult norms for the Corbett Targeted Coin Test

Published:March 11, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2022.09.009

      Highlights

      • This normative data can be used with the Corbett Targeted Coin Test.
      • Median scores ranged from 28.7 to 53.3 seconds.
      • Dexterity to some extent decreased with age and increased with smaller hand spans.

      Abstract

      Study Design

      Clinical measurement

      Introduction

      Dexterity is important for daily activities. The Corbett Targeted Coin Test (CTCT) measures dexterity with palm-to-finger translation and proprioceptive target placement, but lacks established norms.

      Purpose of the Study

      To establish norms for the CTCT with healthy adult subjects.

      Methods

      The inclusion criteria consisted of participants that were community dwelling, non-institutionalized, able to make a fist with both hands, perform finger-to-palm translation of twenty coins, and be at least 18 years of age. CTCT standardized testing procedures were followed. Quality of performance (QoP) scores were determined by speed in seconds and number of coin drops (each a 5-second penalty). QoP was summarized within each age, gender and hand dominance subgroup using the mean, median, minimum, and maximum. Correlation coefficients were computed for relationships between age and QoP, and between handspan and QoP.

      Results

      Of the 207 individuals who participated, 131 were females and 76 males with an age range of 18-86 and mean age of 37.16. Individual QoP scores ranged from 13.8 to 105.3 seconds, with median scores ranging from 28.7 to 53.3 seconds. The mean for males was 37.5 seconds for the dominant hand (range 15.7-105.3) and 42.3 seconds (range 17.9.-86.8) for the non-dominant hand. The mean for females was 34.7 seconds for the dominant hand (range 14.8-67.0) and 38.6 seconds (range 13.8.-82.7) for the non-dominant hand. Lower QoP scores indicate a faster and/or more accurate dexterity performance. Females showed better median QoP for most age groups. The best median QoP scores were seen in the 30-39 and 40-49 age ranges.

      Discussion

      Our study agrees to some extent with other research that reported dexterity decreases with age, and increases with smaller hand spans.

      Conclusion

      Normative data for the CTCT can be a guide for clinicians evaluating and monitoring patient dexterity with palm-to-finger translation and proprioceptive target placement.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Yong Y
        • MacDermid JC
        • Packham T.
        Defining dexterity—untangling the discourse in clinical practice.
        J Hand Ther. 2020; 33 (ISSN 0894-1130): 517-519https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2019.11.001
        • Hebert JS
        • Lewicke J
        • Williams TR
        • Vette AH.
        Normative data for modified box and blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014; 51: 918-932https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2013.10.0228
        • Uzochukwu JC
        • Stegemöller EL.
        Repetitive finger movement and dexterity tasks in people with Parkinson's disease.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2019; 73: 1-8https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.028738
        • Gonzales V
        • Rowson J
        • Yoxall A.
        Development of the variable dexterity test: construction, reliability and validity.
        Int J Ther Rehab. 2015; 22: 174-180https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2015.22.4.174
        • Grice K
        • Vogel K
        • Le V
        • Mitchell A
        • Muniz S
        • Vollmer M.
        Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2003; 57: 570-573https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.5.570
        • Pramodha M
        • Francis T.
        Dexterity measurement across the age span (3-25 years) with Jebsen Hand Function Test—an observational study.
        Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 2017; 11: 144-147https://doi.org/10.5958/0973-5674.2017.00092.2
        • American Occupational Therapy Association
        Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process—fourth edition.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2020; 74: 4114-4128https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74s2001
        • Rule K
        • Ferro J
        • Hoffman A
        • et al.
        Purdue manual dexterity testing: a cohort study of community-dwelling elderly.
        J Hand Ther. 2021; 34: 116-120https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2019.12.006
        • Cho ML
        • Kim DJ
        • Yang Y.
        Effects of visual perceptual intervention on visual-motor integration and activities of daily living performance of children with cerebral palsy.
        J Phys Ther Sci. 2015; 27: 411-413https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.411
        • Lo ST
        • Collin PJ
        • Hokken-Koelega AC.
        Visual-motor integration in children with Prader-Willi syndrome.
        J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015; 59: 827-834https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12197
        • Pereira DM
        • Araújo R
        • Braccialli LM.
        Relationship analysis between visual-motor integration ability and academic performance.
        J Hum Growth Dev. 2011; 21 (researchgate.net/publication/317462934_Relationship_analysis_between_visual-motor_integration_ability_and_academic_performance): 808-817
        • Liutsko L
        • Muiños R
        • Tous-Ral JM.
        Age-related differences in proprioceptive and visuo-proprioceptive function in relation to fine motor behavior.
        Eur J Ageing. 2014; 11: 221-232https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-013-0304-6
        • Walsh JM.
        • Chee N.
        Hand and upper extremity injuries.
        (In: Pendleton HM, Schultz-Krohn W)Occupational Therapy Practice Skills for Physical Dysfunction. 8th ed. Elsevier, 2018: 972-1003
        • Beasley J.
        Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: Conservative therapeutic management.
        J Hand Ther. 2012; 25 (163-72)
        • Corbett JJ.
        Conceptualization of a palm to finger translation and targeted coin placement test.
        J Hand Ther. 2018; 31: 151-153https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2017.11.017
        • Klymenko G
        • Liu K
        • Bissett M
        • Fong K
        • Welage N
        • Wong R.
        Development and initial validity of the in-hand manipulation assessment.
        Aust Occup Ther J. 2017; 65 (101111/1440-1630.12447): 135-145
        • Exner CE.
        Content validity of the in-hand manipulation test.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1993; 47: 505-513https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.6.505
        • Grice KO.
        The use of occupation-based assessments and intervention in the hand therapy setting—a survey.
        J Hand Ther. 2015; 28: 300-306https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2015.01.005
        • Mathiowetz V
        • Rogers SL
        • Dowe-Keval M
        • Donahoe L
        • Rennells C.
        The Purdue pegboard: norms for 14- to 19-year-olds.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1986; 40: 174-179https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.40.3.174
        • Mathiowetz V
        • Volland G
        • Kashman N
        • Weber K.
        Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1985; 39: 386-391https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.39.6.386
        • Mathiowetz V
        • Weber K
        • Kashman N
        • Volland G.
        Adult norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity.
        Occup Ther J Res. 1985; 5: 24-38https://doi.org/10.1177/153944928500500102
        • Nolte MT
        • Shauver MJ
        • Chung KC
        Normative values of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire for patients with and without hand conditions.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140 (425e–433e)https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003581
        • Beaumont JL
        • Havlik R
        • Cook KF
        • et al.
        Norming plans for the NIH toolbox.
        Neurology. 2013; 80: S87-S92https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872e70
        • Wang Y
        • Bohannon R
        • Kapellusch J
        • Garg A
        • Gershon R.
        Dexterity as measured with the 9-hole peg test (9-HPT) across the age span.
        J Hand Ther. 2015; 28: 53-60https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2014.09.002
        • Kalron A
        • Greenberg-Abrahami M
        • Gelav S
        • Achiron A.
        Effects of a new sensory re-education training tool on hand sensibility and manual dexterity in people with multiple sclerosis.
        NeuroRehabilitation. 2013; 32: 943-948https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-130917
        • Lin KC
        • Chuang LL
        • Wu CY
        • Hsieh YW
        • Chang WY.
        Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010; 47: 563https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2009.09.0155
        • Qian Q
        • Ling YT
        • Zhong H
        • Zheng Y-P
        • Alam M.
        Restoration of arm and hand functions via noninvasive cervical cord neuromodulation after traumatic brain injury: a case study.
        Brain Inj. 2020; 34: 1771-1780https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2020.1850864
        • Zhang F
        • Momeni K
        • Ramanujam A
        • et al.
        Cervical spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation improves upper extremity and hand function in people with complete tetraplegia: a case study.
        IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020; 28: 3167-3174https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3048592
        • Jaquet JB
        • Luijsterburg AJ
        • Kalmijn S
        • Kuypers PD
        • Hofman A
        • Hovius SE.
        Median, ulnar, and combined median-ulnar nerve injuries: functional outcome and return to productivity.
        J Trauma. 2001; 51: 687-692https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200110000-00011
        • Bailey R
        • Kaskutas V
        • Fox I
        • Baum CM
        • Mackinnon SE.
        Effect of upper extremity nerve damage on activity participation, pain, depression, and quality of life.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2009; 34: 1682-1688https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.07.002
        • Crisco JJ
        • Heard WMR
        • Rich RR
        • Paller DJ
        • Wolfe SW.
        The mechanical axes of the wrist are oriented obliquely to the anatomical axes.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 169-177https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.i.01222
        • Moojen TM
        • Snel JG
        • Ritt MJPF
        • Venema HW
        • Kauer JMG
        • Bos KE.
        In vivo analysis of carpal kinematics and comparative review of the literature.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2003; 28: 81-87https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2003.50009
        • Brigstocke GHO
        • Hearnden A
        • Holt C
        • Whatling G.
        In-vivo confirmation of the use of the dart thrower's motion during activities of daily living.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012; 39: 373-378https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193412460149
        • Kaufman-Cohen Y
        • Friedman J
        • Levanon Y
        • Jacobi G
        • Doron N
        • Portnoy S.
        Wrist plane of motion and range during daily activities.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2018; 72: 1-10https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.026997
        • Klymenko G
        • Liu KP
        • Bissett M
        • Fong KN
        • Welage N
        • Wong RS.
        Development and initial validity of the in-hand manipulation assessment.
        Aust Occup Ther J. 2018; 65: 135-145https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12447
        • Gray SS
        • Velleman PF
        • Aaron DH
        • Rose BW
        • Gogola GR.
        Trends in dexterity and normative values for the functional dexterity test (FDT).
        J Hand Ther. 2011; 24: 385https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2011.07.019
        • Ruiz J
        • Espana-Romera V
        • Ortega F
        • Sjostrom M
        • Castillo M
        • Gutierrez A.
        Hand span influences optimal grip span in male and female teenagers.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31: 1367-1372https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.06.014
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Available at: cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html. Accessed November 4, 2021.

        • Papadatou-Pastou M
        • Ntolka E
        • Schmitz J
        • et al.
        Human handedness: a meta-analysis.
        Psychol Bull. 2020; 146: 481-524https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000229