- •Despite being trained in more holistic treatment approaches, occupational therapists who are certified hand therapists (CHTs) report that a biomechanical intervention approach is their primary approach to treating clients with upper extremity injuries.
- •While many occupational therapist CHTs will integrate occupation-based assessment and interventions into their therapy sessions, most do not formally assess for psychosocial dysfunction, and they do so even less with worker's compensation clients.
- •There is a need for better standardized tools to assess psychosocial factors for hand injured clients.
Occupational therapists address occupations, performance skills, and client factors that interfere with the successful occupational engagement in everyday activities, including psychosocial factors. However, due to the biomechanical model focus within hand therapy clinics, provision of a holistic care plan remains challenging for occupational therapists. If a client's psychosocial functioning is not addressed, progress toward a full recovery may be limited.
The purpose of this study was to identify how occupational therapists who are certified hand therapists (CHTs), address and provide interventions to clients with psychosocial factors that negatively impact function.
CHTs completed an electronic survey (n = 117) followed by a virtual focus group (n = 9). Survey data analysis included descriptive and correlational statistics to highlight frequencies, ranges, and relationships between the participant demographics and the selection of assessment and the intervention approaches. Thematic analysis guided the qualitative coding of the focus group transcripts.
Of the 117 survey respondents, 79% reported frequent use of the biomechanical approach. The most frequently administered assessment included the Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (n = 45; 40.9%). Five themes emerged from the focus groups: hand dysfunction impacts roles and routines; client rapport building takes time; CHT hesitation to address psychosocial factors; standardized assessments need to evaluate psychosocial factors that impact client function; and education and communication are critical intervention approaches.
Occupational therapy practitioners primarily utilize the biomechanical approach and are less likely to assess or treat psychosocial factors that impact a client's function. However, participants reported a need for a standardized assessment to identify the psychosocial factors that impact their clients’ functional performance. Further research is warranted to increase the measurement and the use of holistic theoretical models of practice, assessments, and intervention approaches.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Systematic review: predicting adverse psychological outcomes after hand trauma.J Hand Ther. 2017; 30: 407-419https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2016.11.006
- Coping strategies used by people with a major hand injury: a review of the literature.Br J Occup Ther. 2014; 77: 289-295https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.024
- The relationship between hand function, depression, and the psychological impact of trauma in patients with traumatic hand injury.Int J Rehabil Res. 2014; 37: 105-109https://doi.org/10.1097/MMR.0000000000000040
- Psychosocial issues after a traumatic hand injury: Facilitating adjustment.J Hand Ther. 2011; 24: 95-103https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2010.11.001
- Work transition after hand injury: a scoping review.J Hand Ther. 2020; (S0894-1130(20)30186-1): 1-12https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2020.10.007
- Non-physical factors that impact return to work in individuals with upper extremity injuries: a scoping review.Work. 2022; 73
- Ten years follow-up of trauma-related psychological distress in a cohort of patients with acute traumatic hand injury.Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2012; 16: 128-135https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2012.03.006
- Effect of anxiety and catastrophic pain ideation on early recovery after surgery for distal radius fractures.J Hand Ther. 2014; 39: 2258-2264https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.007
- Predictors of pain intensity and disability after mind hand surgery.J Hand Surg. 2010; 35: 956-960https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.02.001
- The assessment of psychological factors on upper extremity disability: a scoping review.J Hand Ther. 2017; 31: 511-523https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.017
- Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (4th ed.).Am J Occup Ther. 2020; 74: p1-p87https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
- Thirty years of hand therapy: The 2014 practice analysis.J Hand Ther. 2016; 29: 222-234https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2016.02.011
- Holism in occupational therapy: elusive fiction and ambivalent struggle.Am J Occup Ther. 2001; 55: 268-276https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.3.268
- Occupational therapists working in hand therapy: the practice of holism in a cost containment environment.Work. 2002; 19: 35-45
- The use of occupation-based assessments and intervention in the hand therapy setting-A survey.J Hand Ther. 2015; 28: 300-306https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2015.01.005
- An occupational perspective in hand therapy: a scoping review.Br J Occup Ther. 2018; 81: 299-318https://doi.org/10.1177/03080225617752110
- The benefits and challenges to the use of occupation in hand therapy.Occup Ther Health Care. 2010; 24: 130-146https://doi.org/10.2109/07380570903349378
- Hand therapy interventions, outcomes, and diagnoses evaluated over the last 10 years: A mapping review linking research to practice.J Hand Ther. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.018
McMillan IR. The biomechanical frame of reference in occupational therapy. In: Duncan EAS, ed. Foundations for practice in occupational therapy. 5th Ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2011:179-194; 2011.
- Clinical utility and validity of the occupation-centered intervention assessment for occupational therapy mental health practice.Ann Int Occup Ther. 2021; https://doi.org/10.3928/24761222-20210601-04
- Evaluation and treatment of musicians from a holistic perspective.Open J Occup Ther. 2019; 7: 1-10https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1581
- Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs.Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1989; 11: 255-274
- Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice.3rd ed. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, PA2015
- A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research.Int J Qual Methods. 2009; 8: 1-21
- IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 25.0.IBM Corp, Armonk, NY2017
- Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.Qual Health Res. 2005; 15: 1277-1288https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
- Using thematic analysis in psychology.Quan Res Psychol. 2006; 3: 77-101
- Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies.5th ed. Mosby, Philadelphia2016
- Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: guidelines for occupational therapists.Aust Occup Ther J. 2007; 54: 88-94https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00661.x
- Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research.3rd ed. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA2018
- Do patient-reported outcome measures capture functioning aspects and environmental factors important to individuals with injuries or disorders of the hand.J Hand Ther. 2013; 26: 332-342https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2013.06.002
- Hand therapist use of patient report outcome (PRO) in practice: a survey study.J Hand Ther. 2014; 27: 299-308https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2014.07.001
- The use of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire in rehabilitation after acute trauma hand injuries.J Hand Ther. 2007; 20 (-46): 49https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.004
- Healing or harming? Healthcare provider interactions with injured workers and insurers in workers’ compensation system.J Occup Rehabil. 2015; 25: 220-239https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9521-x
- Effective occupational therapy interventions in the rehabilitation of individuals with work-related low back injuries and illness: A systematic review.Am J Occup Ther. 2011; 65: 37-43https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.09187
Published online: September 18, 2022
Accepted: July 3, 2022
Received in revised form: June 22, 2022
Received: August 20, 2021
Publication stageIn Press Corrected Proof
Conflict of interest: All named authors hereby declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.