Advertisement

Case report illustrating use of serial elastic tension digital neoprene orthoses (ETDNO) protocol in the treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture

      Highlights

      • New protocol as a novel option for the treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture.
      • First orthosis 24 hour per day application in treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture.
      • New orthosis design, more comfortable for the patient, allows prolonged clinical use.

      Abstract

      Introduction

      This case report details the application of a treatment regimen using a serial elastic tension digital neoprene orthosis (ETDNO) protocol for a patient with an eight-month-old finger crush injury who experienced recurrence of a 45º proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) flexion contracture two months after arthrolysis.

      Purpose of the Study

      To illustrate how the application strategy of ETDNO can increase the daily total end range time (TERT) and modify finger stiffness.

      Results

      The patient reached full extension following 15 weeks of ETDNO treatment. The six-month follow-up evaluation revealed that the PIPJ was stable with full flexion and extension. The joint did not require continued orthosis use.

      Discussion

      The literature describes orthosis application as the treatment of choice for PIPJ flexion contracture, but no study has described an ideal program for use nor the full and stable resolution of the flexion contracture. The current literature describes a maximum daily total end range time (TERT) of 12 hours a per day. The serial ETDNO protocol that this study described increased the daily TERT to nearly 24 hour per day and demonstrated an excellent result in the treatment of PIPJ flexion contracture

      Conclusion

      This outcome suggests that clinicians will want to consider this new orthosis design and management protocol as a novel option for the treatment of PIPJ flexion contracture. We need future research to better define the optimum number of hours of daily TERT for the effective treatment of PIPJ flexion contracture. In addition, we will also benefit from the exploration of the optimum orthosis design to enable the highest amount of TERT

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Peacock EE.
        Some biochemical and biophysical aspects of joint stiffness.
        Ann Surg. 1966; 164: 1-12https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-196607000-00001
        • Brand PW.
        Mechanical factors in joint stiffness and tissue growth.
        J Hand Ther. 1995; 8: 91-96https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80305-x
        • Kaplan FT.
        The stiff finger.
        Hand Clin. 2010; 26: 191-204https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2010.02.001
        • Bowers WH.
        The anatomy of the interphalangeal joints.
        in: Bowers WH The Interphalangeal Joints. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, Melbourne and New York1987: 2-13
        • Prosser R.
        Splinting in the management of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture.
        J Hand Ther. 1996; 9: 378-386https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-1130(96)80045-7
        • Houshian S
        • Jing S
        • Chikkamuniyappa C
        • Kazemian GH
        • Emami-Moghaddam-Tehrani M
        Management of posttraumatic proximal interphalangeal joint contracture.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2013; 38: 1651-1658
        • Sprague BL.
        Proximal interphalangeal joint injuries and their initial treatment.
        J Trauma. 1975; 15: 380-385https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197505000-00002
        • Harrison DH.
        The stiff proximal interphalangeal joint.
        Hand. 1977; 9: 102-108https://doi.org/10.1016/s0072-968x(77)80002-8
        • Frank C
        • Akeson WH
        • Woo SL
        • Amiel D
        • Coutts RD.
        Physiology and therapeutic value of passive joint motion.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; 185: 113-125
        • Kolumban SL.
        The role of static and dynamic splints physiotherapy techniques and time in straightening contracted interphalangeal joints.
        Lepr India. 1969; 4: 323-328
        • McClure PW
        • Blackburn LG
        • Dusold C.
        The use of splints in the treatment of joint stiffness: biologic rationale and an algorithm for making clinical decisions.
        Phys Ther. 1994; 74: 1101-1107https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/74.12.1101
        • Flowers KR.
        A proposed decision hierarchy for splinting the stiff joint, with an emphasis on force application parameters.
        J Hand Ther. 2002; 15: 158-162https://doi.org/10.1053/hanthe.2002.v15.015015
        • Fess E.
        Force magnitude of commercial spring-coil and spring-wire splints designed to extend the proximal interphalangeal joint.
        J Hand Ther. 1988; 1: 86-90https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(88)80053-X
        • Callahan A
        • McEntee P.
        Splinting proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contractures: a new design.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1986; 40: 408-413https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.40.6.408
        • Flowers KR
        • LaStayo P.
        Effect of total end range time on improving passive range of motion.
        J Hand Ther. 1994; 7: 150-157https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80056-1
        • Bell-Krotoski JA
        • Figarola JH.
        Biomechanics of soft-tissue growth and remodeling with plaster casting.
        J Hand Ther. 1995; 8: 131-137https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80310-3
        • Schultz-Johnson K.
        Static progressive splinting.
        J Hand Ther. 2002; 15: 163-178https://doi.org/10.1053/hanthe.2002.v15.015016
        • Steffen T
        • Mollinger L.
        Low-load, prolonged stretch in the treatment of knee flexion contractures in nursing home residents.
        Phys Ther. 1995; 75: 886-897https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/75.10.886
        • Glasgow C
        • Wilton J
        • Tooth L.
        Optimal daily total end range time for contracture: resolution in hand splinting.
        J Hand Ther. 2003; 16: 207-218https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-1130(03)00036-x
        • Glasgow C
        • Fleming J
        • Tooth LR
        • Peters S.
        Randomized controlled trial of daily total end range time (TERT) for Capener splinting of the stiff proximal interphalangeal joint.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2012; 66: 243-248https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2012.002816
        • Punsola-Izard V
        • Rouzaud JC
        • Thomas D
        • Lluch Garcia-Elias
        Le collage en tension dans les orthèses dynamiques en matériau néoprène [Tension force in dynamic splints made of neoprene].
        Chir Main. 2001; 20: 231-235https://doi.org/10.1016/s1297-3203(01)00039-7
        • Clark EN.
        A preliminary investigation of the neoprene tube finger extension splint.
        J Hand Ther. 1997; 10: 213-221
        • Wollstein R
        • Rodgers J
        • Ogden T.
        A novel splint for proximal interphalangeal joint contractures: a case report.
        Arch Phys Med and Rehab. 2012; 93: 1856-1859