Advertisement

Kinematic evaluation and reliability assessment of the Nine Hole Peg Test for manual dexterity

Published:February 26, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2022.01.007

      Highlights

      • The Nine Hole Peg Test is one of the most used tools to assess manual dexterity.
      • Kinematic indexes during Nine Hole Peg Test were reliable.
      • Jerk revealed the best discriminant validity between dominant and non-dominant arms.
      • Kinematic indexes may help detection of subtle manual dexterity changes.
      • Kinematic indexes may provide characteristics of upper limb motor impairments.

      Abstract

      Background

      The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) is one of the most frequently used tools to assess manual dexterity. However, no kinematic parameters are provided to describe the quality of the motor performance, since time is the only score.

      Purpose

      To investigate test-retest and intra-rater reliability, correlation with clinical test score, and discriminant validity of kinematic indexes during NHPT.

      Study Design

      A clinical measurement study.

      Methods

      Twenty-five healthy right-handed volunteers performed the NHPT. An experienced physiotherapist administered two sessions at a 6-hour interval with two trials for dominant and non-dominant upper limbs. An optoelectronic system was used to detect NHPT performance, which was divided into nine consecutive peg-grasp, peg-transfer, peg-in-hole, hand-return phases, and one final removing phase. Outcome measures were total and single phases times, normalized jerk, mean, peak and time-to-peak of velocity, curvature index during peg-grasp and hand-return phases, and trunk 3D displacement. The statistical analysis included Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) for test-retest and intra-rater reliability, Pearson's coefficients for correlation with the NHPT score, and paired t-tests for discriminant validity.

      Results

      Test-retest reliability was excellent for trunk rotation (ICC: 0.91) and good to moderate for the other indexes (ICCs: 0.89-0.61). Intra-rater reliability was excellent for total and removing times (ICCs: 0.91 and 0.94) and good to moderate for the other indexes (ICCs: 0.84-0.66), except for trunk inclination (ICC: 0.37). NHPT phases, normalized jerk, mean velocity, peak of velocity, time-to-peak and curvature index correlated with total time (r-score: 0.8-0.3). NHPT phases and most kinematic indexes discriminated the dominant from non-dominant upper limb, with the greatest effect size for normalized jerk during hand-return (d = 1.16).

      Conclusions

      Kinematic indexes during NHPT can be considered for manual dexterity assessment. These indexes may allow for the detection of kinematic changes responsible for NHPT score variations in healthy subjects or patients with upper limb impairments.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chan T.
        An investigation of finger and manual dexterity.
        Percept Mot Skills. 2000; 90: 537-542
        • Oxford Grice K
        • Vogel KA
        • Le V
        • Mitchell A
        • Muniz S
        • Vollmer MA
        Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2003; 57: 570-573
        • Metcalf CD
        • Irvine TA
        • Sims JL
        • Wang YL
        • Su AW
        • Norris DO.
        Complex hand dexterity: a review of biomechanical methods for measuring musical performance.
        Front Psychol. 2014; 5: 414
        • Chen HM
        • Chen CC
        • Hsueh IP
        • Huang SL
        • Hsieh CL.
        Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 435-440
        • Earhart GM
        • Cavanaugh JT
        • Ellis T
        • Ford MP
        • Foreman KB
        • Dibble L.
        The 9-hole PEG test of upper extremity function: average values, test-retest reliability, and factors contributing to performance in people with Parkinson disease.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011; 35: 157-163
        • Hervault M
        • Balto JM
        • Hubbard EA
        • Motl RW.
        Reliability, precision, and clinically important change of the Nine-Hole Peg Test in individuals with multiple sclerosis.
        Int J Rehabil Res. 2017; 40: 91-93
        • Johansson GM
        • Häger CK.
        A modified standardized nine hole peg test for valid and reliable kinematic assessment of dexterity post-stroke.
        J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019; 16: 8
        • Chen W
        • Xiong C
        • Huang X
        • Sun R
        • Xiong Y.
        Kinematic analysis and dexterity evaluation of upper extremity in activities of daily living.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 32: 475-481
        • Carment L
        • Abdellatif A
        • Lafuente-Lafuente C
        • et al.
        Manual dexterity and aging: a pilot study disentangling sensorimotor from cognitive decline.
        Front Neurol. 2018; 9: 910
        • Yancosek KE
        • Howell D.
        A narrative review of dexterity assessments.
        J Hand Ther. 2009; 22: 258-269
        • Koyama T
        • Domen K
        • Yokoe M
        • Sakoda S
        • Kandori A.
        Psychometrics of dominant right hand during the 9-hole PEG test: differences between PEG placement and removal.
        PM R. 2011; 3: 40-44
        • Oldfield RC.
        The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.
        Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9: 97-113
        • Wang YC
        • Magasi SR
        • Bohannon RW
        • et al.
        Assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox.
        J Hand Ther. 2011; 24: 313-320
        • Dominguez-Muñoz FJ
        • Hernández-Mocholi MA
        • Manso LJ
        • Collado-Mateo D
        • Villafaina S
        • Adsuar JC
        • Gusi N.
        Test-retest reliability of kinematic parameters of timed up and go in people with type 2 diabetes.
        Applied Sciences. 2019; 9: 4709
        • Awatani T
        • Mori S
        • Shinohara J
        • et al.
        Same-session and between-day intra-rater reliability of hand-held dynamometer measurements of isometric shoulder extensor strength.
        J Phys Ther Sci. 2016; 28: 936-939
        • Maynard V
        • Bakheit AM
        • Oldham J
        • Freeman J.
        Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of gait measurements with CODA mpx30 motion analysis system.
        Gait Posture. 2003; 17: 59-67
        • van der Kruk E
        • Reijne MM.
        Accuracy of human motion capture systems for sport applications; state-of-the-art review.
        Eur J Sport Sci. 2018; 18: 806-819
        • Zago M
        • Luzzago M
        • Marangoni T
        • De Cecco M
        • Tarabini M
        • Galli M.
        3D tracking of human motion using visual skeletonization and stereoscopic vision.
        Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8: 181
        • Rab G
        • Petuskey K
        • Bagley A.
        A method for determination of upper extremity kinematics.
        Gait Posture. 2002; 15: 113-119
        • Yan JH
        • Hinrichs RN
        • Payne VG
        • Thomas JR
        Normalized jerk: a measure to capture developmental characteristics of young girls’ overarm throwing.
        J Appl Biomech. 2000; 16: 196-203
        • Wu G
        • van der Helm FC
        • Veeger HE
        • et al.
        ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion–Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.
        J Biomech. 2005; 38: 981-992
        • Beebe JA
        • Lang CE.
        Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009; 33: 96-103
        • Earhart GM
        • Cavanaugh JT
        • Ellis T
        • Ford MP
        • Foreman KB
        • Dibble L.
        The 9-hole PEG test of upper extremity function: average values, test-retest reliability, and factors contributing to performance in people with Parkinson disease.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011; 35: 157-163
        • Erasmus LP
        • Sarno S
        • Albrecht H
        • Schwecht M
        • Pöllmann W
        • König N.
        Measurement of ataxic symptoms with a graphic tablet: standard values in controls and validity in Multiple Sclerosis patients.
        J Neurosci Methods. 2001; 108: 25-37
        • Lamers I
        • Kerkhofs L
        • Raats J
        • Kos D
        • Van Wijmeersch B
        • Feys P.
        Perceived and actual arm performance in multiple sclerosis: relationship with clinical tests according to hand dominance.
        Mult Scler. 2013; 19: 1341-1348
        • Koo KT
        • Li MY
        A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficient for reliability research.
        J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-163
        • Akoglu H.
        User's guide to correlation coefficients.
        Turk J Emerg Med. 2018; 18: 91-93
        • Durlak JA.
        How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes.
        J Pediatr Psychol. 2009; 34: 917-928
        • Bowler M
        • Amirabdollahian F
        • Dautenhahn K.
        Using an embedded reality approach to improve test reliability for NHPT tasks.
        IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011; 20115975343
        • Cai S
        • Li G
        • Zhang X
        • Huang S
        • Zheng H
        • Ma K
        • Xie L.
        Detecting compensatory movements of stroke survivors using pressure distribution data and machine learning algorithms.
        J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019; 16: 131
        • Scott SH.
        Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control.
        Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004; 5: 532-546
        • Jaspers E
        • Feys H
        • Bruyninckx H
        • Harlaar J
        • Molenaers G
        • Desloovere K.
        Upper limb kinematics: development and reliability of a clinical protocol for children.
        Gait Posture. 2011; 33: 279-285
        • Schneiberg S
        • McKinley P
        • Gisel E
        • Sveistrup H
        • Levin MF.
        Reliability of kinematic measures of functional reaching in children with cerebral palsy.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010; 52: e167-e173
        • Patterson TS
        • Bishop MD
        • McGuirk TE
        • Sethi A
        • Richards LG.
        Reliability of upper extremity kinematics while performing different tasks in individuals with stroke.
        J Mot Behav. 2011; 43: 121-130
        • Valevicius AM
        • Jun PY
        • Hebert JS
        • Vette AH.
        Use of optical motion capture for the analysis of normative upper body kinematics during functional upper limb tasks: A systematic review.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018; 40: 1-15
        • Térémetz M
        • Colle F
        • Hamdoun S
        • Maier MA
        • Lindberg PG.
        A novel method for the quantification of key components of manual dexterity after stroke.
        J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015; 12: 64
        • Yadav V
        • Sainburg RL.
        Limb dominance results from asymmetries in predictive and impedance control mechanisms.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9: e93892
        • Aoki T
        • Rivlis G
        • Schieber MH.
        Handedness and index finger movements performed on a small touchscreen.
        J Neurophysiol. 2016; 115: 858-867
        • Butler EE
        • Ladd AL
        • Lamont LE
        • Rose J.
        Temporal-spatial parameters of the upper limb during a Reach & Grasp Cycle for children.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 32: 301-306