Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 35, ISSUE 2, P267-274, April 2022

Download started.

Ok

Effective long-term management of brachial plexus injury following surgery: What is needed from hand therapists’ perspectives

Published:March 02, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2022.01.006

      Highlights

      • Given the long-term recovery following BPI, consideration should be given to relevance of slow stream rehab and interdisciplinary care.
      • Consider upskilling or an interdisciplinary care model to assist hand therapists and the provision of pain management and psychological support.
      • Increased dissemination of resources to support hand therapists working with individuals following BPI and enhanced communication opportunities to develop networks both nationally and internationally.

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Traumatic, brachial plexus injuries (BPI) result represent a significant cost to the individual and society. Recovery involves multiple surgeries, takes years, and often results in permanent physical dysfunction. While the last couple of decades have seen advancements in surgical management, the BPI rehabilitation literature has not kept pace with these developments.

      Purpose

      We aim to explore the experience of public and privately employed hand therapists’ in delivering effective long-term rehabilitation services to inviduals with BPI in Australia.

      Methods

      An interpretative qualitative study. Two focus groups were conducted with Australian hand therapists’ (n = 10). Data were analyzed using an inductive thematic approach.

      Results

      Three key themes were generated from the data. The first theme ‘Falling through the gaps: overlooked components of therapy for BPI’ captures participants’ thoughts on postinjury health care and rehabilitation services. The second ‘Developing a therapeutic alliance: underpinned by time and trust’ relates to the relationship building challenges and opportunities following trauma that will withstand the long-term recovery of individuals following BPI. The last theme, ‘Factors required for professional development: knowledge and support,’ considers the variation seen with these clients in relation to therapy needs and outcomes.

      Conclusions

      The findings of this study highlight the need to better equip hand therapists’ skills and knowledge in responding to pain and psychological management post BPI. Our results reinforce the benefit of interdisciplinary models of care in the management of individuals with BPI.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hruby LA
        • Pittermann A
        • Sturma A
        • Aszmann OC.
        The Vienna psychosocial assessment procedure for bionic reconstruction in patients with global brachial plexus injuries.
        PLoS One. 2018; 13: 1-18
        • Kaiser R
        • Waldauf P
        • Ullas G
        • Krajcová A.
        Epidemiology, etiology, and types of severe adult brachial plexus injuries requiring surgical repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Neruosurg Rev. 2018; (July): 1-10
        • Wali AR
        • Santiago-Dieppa DR
        • Brown JM
        • Mandeville R.
        Nerve transfer versus muscle transfer to restore elbow flexion after pan-brachial plexus injury: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2017; 43: E4
        • Felici N
        • Zaami S
        • Ciancolini G
        • Marinelli E
        • Tagliente D
        • Cannatà C.
        Cost analysis of brachial plexus injuries: variability of compensation by insurance companies before and after surgery.
        Handchir Mikrochir plast Chir. 2014; 46: 85-89
        • Dy CJ
        • Lingampalli N
        • Peacock K
        • Olsen MA
        • Ray WZ
        • Brogan DM.
        Direct cost of surgically treated adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries.
        J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020; 2: 77-79
        • Hong TS
        • Tian A
        • Sachar R
        • Ray WZ
        • Brogan DM
        • Dy CJ.
        Indirect cost of traumatic brachial plexus injuries in the United States.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101: e80
        • Hébert-Blouin M-N
        • Spinner RJ
        • Bishop AT
        • Chapter Shin AY.
        • Chung K
        • Yang L.J.-S
        • McGillicuddy JE.
        19: Reconstructive procedures for the upper extremity.
        (eds)Practical management of pediatric and adult brachial plexus palsies. Saunders/Elsevier, Edinburgh; New York2012: 249-270
      1. Australian hand therapy association.
        Hand Ther. 2021; (PublishedAccessed 19/09/2021)
        • Takata SC
        • Wade ET
        • Roll SC.
        Hand therapy interventions, outcomes, and diagnoses evaluated over the last 10 years: a mapping review linking research to practice.
        J Hand Ther. 2017; 32: 1-9
        • Frampton V.
        Problems in managing reconstructive surgery for brachial plexus lesions contrasted with peripheral nerve lesions.
        J Hand Surg. 1986; 11: 3-9
        • Kahn LC
        • Moore AM.
        Donor activation focused rehabilitation approach: maximizing outcomes after nerve transfers.
        Hand Clin. 2016; 32: 263-277
        • Kinlaw D.
        Pre-/postoperative therapy for adult plexus injury.
        Hand Clin. 2005; 21: 103-108
        • Braun V
        • Clarke V.
        Using thematic analysis in psychology.
        Qual Res. 2006; 3: 77-101
        • Lewis-Beck MS
        • Bryman A
        • Liao TF
        SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods.
        SAGE Publications, 2003: 17
        • Braun V
        • Clarke V.
        Thematic analysis. In: APA handbook of research methods in psychology.
        Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. 2. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US2012: 57-71
        • Krefting L.
        Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1991; 45: 214-222
        • Lincoln YS
        • Guba EG.
        Naturalistic Inquiry.
        Sage, Beverley Hills, CA1985
        • Tong A
        • Sainsbury P
        • Craig J.
        Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 349-357
        • Janssen RMJ
        • Satink T
        • Ijspeert J
        • et al.
        Reflections of patients and therapists on a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for persons with brachial plexus injuries.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2019; 41: 1427-1434
        • van Alfen N
        • van Engelen BGM.
        The clinical spectrum of neuralgic amyotrophy in 246 cases.
        Brain. 2006; 129: 438-450
        • Brito S
        • White J
        • Thomacos N
        • Hill B.
        The lived experience following free functioning muscle transfer for management of pan-brachial plexus injury: reflections from a long-term follow-up study.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2019; : 1-9
        • McDonald J
        • Pettigrew J.
        Traumatic brachial plexus injury: the lived experience.
        Br J Occup Ther. 2014; 77: 147-154
        • Brown H
        • Johnson K
        • Gilbert A
        • Quick TJ
        The lived experience of motor recovery of elbow flexion following Oberlin nerve transfer: a qualitative analysis.
        Hand Ther. 2018; : 130-138
        • Bekkers S
        • Becker SJE
        • Bossen JKJ
        • Mudgal CS
        • Ring D
        • Vranceanu A-M.
        Relationships between pain misconceptions, disability, patients' goals and interpretation of information from hand therapists.
        J Hand Ther. 2014; 27: 287-295
        • Cole T
        • Nicks R
        • Ferris S
        • Paul E
        • O’Brien L
        • Pritchard E.
        Outcomes after occupational therapy intervention for traumatic brachial plexus injury: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.
        J Hand Ther. 2020; 33: 528-539https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2019.08.002
        • Gray DS.
        Slow-to-recover severe traumatic brain injury: a review of outcomes and rehabilitation effectiveness.
        Brain Inj. 2000; 14: 1003-1014
        • Pereira S
        • Ross Graham J
        • Shahabaz A
        • et al.
        Rehabilitation of individuals with severe stroke: synthesis of best evidence and challenges in implementation.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012; 19: 122-131
        • Piccenna L
        • Knox L
        • Douglas J.
        Slow stream rehabilitation: an overview (Briefing Paper).
        Summer Foundation: La Trobe University. 2016; 30
        • Sloan S
        • Callaway L
        • Winkler D
        • McKinley K
        • Ziino C
        • Anson K
        The community approach to participation: outcomes following acquired brain injury intervention.
        Brain Impair. 2009; 10: 282-294
        • Kaskutas V
        • Powell R.
        The impact of flexor tendon rehabilitation restrictions on individuals' independence with daily activities: implications for hand therapists.
        J Hand Ther. 2013; 26: 22-29
        • Nancarrow SA
        • Booth A
        • Ariss S
        • Smith T
        • Enderby P
        • Roots A.
        Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work.
        Hum Resour Health. 2013; 11: 19
      2. Department of Human Services. Health independence programs guidelines.
        Melbourne: Victorian Government. 2008;
        • Shin YA
        • Spinner JR
        • Steinmann PS
        • Bishop TA.
        Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005; 13: 382-396
        • Tuttas CA.
        Lessons learned using web conference technology for online focus group interviews.
        Qual Health Res. 2015; 25: 122-133
        • Irani E.
        The use of videoconferencing for qualitative interviewing: opportunities, challenges, and considerations.
        Clin Nurs Res. 2019; 28: 3-8

      JHT Read for Credit

      Quiz: # 852

      Record your answers on the Return Answer Form found on the tear-out coupon at the back of this issue or to complete online and use a credit card, go to JHTReadforCredit.com. There is only one best answer for each question.
      • # 1.
        The study design was
        • a.
          prospective cohort
        • b.
          case series
        • c.
          qualitative
        • d.
          RCTs
      • # 2.
        The authors expressed concern that
        • a.
          therapy interventions had not kept pace with surgical advancements
        • b.
          the cost of therapy was prohibitive
        • c.
          too many patients were non-compliant
        • d.
          orthotic fabrication was too difficult
      • # 3.
        Falling through the gap was frequently the result of
        • a.
          insurance restrictions
        • b.
          parental resistance
        • c.
          physician distrust of therapy
        • d.
          concomitant injury
      • # 4.
        One therapist characterized the initial experience as
        • a.
          disturbing
        • b.
          manageable
        • c.
          overwhelming
        • d.
          exhilarating
      • # 5.
        The authors suggest that therapists need to gain a better understanding of the psychological issues and pain components of the BPI patient population
        • a.
          false
        • b.
          true
      When submitting to the HTCC for re-certification, please batch your JHT RFC certificates in groups of 3 or more to get full credit.