Advertisement
Full Length Article| Volume 36, ISSUE 1, P45-59, January 2023

Download started.

Ok

The impact of a hand therapy workplace-based educational approach on the management of lateral elbow tendinopathy: A randomized controlled study

Published:October 29, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.09.004

      Highlights

      • A multimodal hand therapy management program improves pain and function for work-related LET.
      • The addition of a workplace-based hand therapy educational intervention did not negatively or positively impact on outcomes of pain, grip strength and function.
      • Hand therapists have the opportunity to consider the environmental factors as per the ICF framework when managing LET.
      • Providing education about self-management strategies and occupational risk factors improves pain and functional outcomes.

      Abstract

      Background

      Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) is one of the most prevalent work-related musculoskeletal conditions. Management strategies for LET rarely consider patients’ work environments and have limited focus on education regarding occupational risk factors. Workplace-based rehabilitation has shown benefits in the return to work processes for injured workers with other health conditions, but no studies have investigated the impact of a workplace-based educational approach in the management of LET.

      Purposes

      First, to identify the impact of an additional workplace-based educational intervention to standard hand therapy care on the outcomes of pain, grip strength, and function. Second, to identify the effectiveness of standard hand therapy on the same clinical outcomes.

      Study Design

      A randomized controlled trial.

      Methods

      Forty-nine participants were randomized to the control group (n = 25) or intervention group (n = 24). The control group received standard hand therapy for 12 weeks. The intervention group received standard hand therapy for the first 12 weeks plus an additional workplace-based educational intervention, “Working Hands-ED,” delivered by a hand therapist. Pain levels for provocative tests, grip strength, and function were measured using a Numeric Rating Scale, Jamar Dynamometer, and the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation questionnaire at baseline, weeks 6 and 12. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale was also used for the intervention group.

      Results

      There were no statistical differences between both groups for all clinical outcomes by 12 weeks (P> .05). Pain levels for all provocative tests and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation scores statistically improved within both groups (P < .05), however with small effect sizes observed. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale scores statistically improved for the intervention group by 12 weeks (P < .05).

      Conclusion

      The addition of a hand therapy workplace-based intervention did not result in superior clinical outcomes for pain, grip strength, and function. The study identified that a multimodal self-management approach used by hand therapists improved their patients' pain and function regardless of whether the education was given in the clinic or the workplace.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Shiri R
        • Viikari-Juntura E
        • Varonen H
        • Heliövaara M.
        Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: a population study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 164: 1065-1074https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj325
        • Ahmad Z
        • Siddiqui N
        • Malik SS
        • Abdus-Samee M
        • Tytherleigh-Strong G
        • Rushton N.
        Lateral epicondylitis: a review of pathology and management.
        Bone Joint J. 2013; (95-B): 1158-1164https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.29285
        • Bisset LM
        • Vicenzino B.
        Physiotherapy management of lateral epicondylalgia.
        J Physiother. 2015; 61: 174-181https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.015
        • Bachman S.
        Evidence-based approach to treating lateral epicondylitis using the Occupational Adaptation Model.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2016; 70: 1-5https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2016.016972
        • Lenoir H
        • Mares O
        • Carlier Y.
        Management of lateral epicondylitis.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019; 105: S241-S246https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.004
        • Gliedt JA
        • Daniels CJ.
        Chiropractic treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a case report utilizing active release techniques.
        J Chiropr Med. 2014; 13: 104-109https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2014.06.009
        • Bisset LM
        • Vicenzino B.
        Physiotherapy management of lateral epicondylalgia.
        J Physiother. 2015; 61: 174-181https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.015
        • Amar E
        • Chechik O
        • Khashan M
        • Lador R
        • Rath E.
        Lateral epicondylitis treatment: international survey of surgeons’ preferences and literature review.
        Int J Clin Pract. 2014; 68: 1383-1387https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12478
        • Seo J-B
        • Yoon S-H
        • Lee J-Y
        • Kim J-K
        • Yoo J-S.
        Letter to the editor.
        Clin Orthop Surg. 2018; 10: 465-466https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_11
        • Eygendaal D
        • Keijsers R.
        In response to the letter to the editor by Dr. Dimitrios Stasinopoulos.
        Shoulder Elb. 2019; 11: 72-73https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573218816086
        • Stasinopoulos D.
        Letter to the Editor regarding “Deep friction massage versus steroid injection in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.
        Hand. 2019; 14: 841-842https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944719827998
        • Lucado AM
        • Dale RB
        • Vincent J
        • Day JM.
        Do joint mobilizations assist in the recovery of lateral elbow tendinopathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Hand Ther. 2019; 32 (e1): 262-276https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2018.01.010
        • Taylor A
        • Wolff AL.
        The forgotten radial nerve: a conceptual framework for treatment of lateral elbow pain.
        J Hand Ther. 2021; 34: 323-329https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.05.009
        • Coombes B
        • Bisset L
        • Vicenzino B.
        Management of lateral elbow tendinopathy: one size does not fit all.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015; 45: 938-949https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2015.5841
        • Shiri R
        • Viikari-Juntura E.
        Lateral and medial epicondylitis: role of occupational factors.
        Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011; 25: 43-57https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2011.01.013
        • Haahr JP
        • Andersen JH.
        Physical and psychosocial risk factors for lateral epicondylitis: a population based case-referent study.
        Occup Env Med. 2003; 60: 322-329https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.5.322
        • Descatha A
        • Dale AM
        • Silverstein BA
        • Roquelaure Y
        • Rempel D.
        Lateral epicondylitis: new evidence for work relatedness.
        Jt Bone Spine. 2015; 82: 5-7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.10.013
        • Stegink-Jansen CW
        • Bynum JG
        • Lambropoulos AL
        • Patterson RM
        • Cowan AC.
        Lateral epicondylosis: a literature review to link pathology and tendon function to tissue-level treatment and ergonomic interventions.
        J Hand Ther. 2021; 34: 263-297https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.05.005
        • MacDermid JC
        • Wojkowski S
        • Kargus C
        • Marley M
        • Stevenson E.
        Hand therapist management of the lateral epicondylosis: a survey of expert opinion and practice patterns.
        J Hand Ther. 2010; 23: 18-30https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.009
        • Tran T
        • Falkmer T
        • Ciccarelli M.
        Do hand therapists have a role in workplace-based education to manage tennis elbow? Beliefs about effective treatments among Australian hand therapists and medical practitioners.
        Work. 2020; 66: 1-11https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203196
        • Peterson M
        • Elmfeldt D
        • Svärdsudd K.
        Treatment practice in chronic epicondylitis: a survey among general practitioners and physiotherapists in Uppsala County, Sweden.
        Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005; 23: 239-241https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-005-0197-3
        • Hoefsmit N
        • Houkes I
        • Nijhuis F.
        Environmental and personal factors that support early return-to-work: a qualitative study using the ICF as a framework.
        Work. 2014; 48: 203-215https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131657
      1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Available at: http://www.disabilitaincifre.it/documenti/ICF_18.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2018.

        • Winthrop Rose B
        • Kasch MC
        • Aaron DH
        • Stegink-Jansen CW
        Does hand therapy literature incorporate the holistic view of health and function promoted by the world health organization?.
        J Hand Ther. 2011; 24: 84-88https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2010.12.003
        • Povlak S
        • Valdes K.
        Linking ICF components to outcome measures for hand osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.
        J Hand Ther. 2020; 33: 484-492https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2019.12.015
        • Cullen KL
        • Irvin E
        • Collie A
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners.
        J Occup Rehabil. 2017; 28: 1-15https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9690-x
        • Ree E
        • Lie SA
        • Eriksen HR
        • et al.
        Reduction in sick leave by a workplace educational low back pain intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
        Scand J Public Health. 2016; 44: 571-579https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494816653854
        • Oakman J
        • Neupane S
        • Proper KI
        • Kinsman N
        • Nygård CH.
        Workplace interventions to improve work ability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of their effectiveness.
        Scand J Work Environ Heal. 2018; 44: 134-146https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3685
        • The Government of Western Australia
        Clinical Framework for the Delivery of Health Services.
        2012
      2. WorkCover WA. Health providers. Available at: https://www.workcover.wa.gov.au/health-providers/allied-health-providers/. 2016. Accessed June 23, 2020.

        • Karcioglu O
        • Topacoglu H
        • Dikme O
        • Dikme O.
        A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: which to use?.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2018; 36: 707-714https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008
        • Stratford P
        • Levy D.
        Assessing valid change over time in patients with lateral epicondylitis at the elbow.
        Clin J Sport Med. 1994; 4: 88-91
        • Pitts G
        • Uhl TL
        • Day JM.
        Grip strength is more sensitive to changes in elbow position than isolated wrist extension strength in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy.
        J Hand Ther. 2021; 34: 509-511https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2020.03.019
        • Poltawski L
        • Watson T.
        Measuring clinically important change with the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation.
        Hand Ther. 2011; 16: 52-57https://doi.org/10.1258/ht.2011.011013
        • Evans JP
        • Porter I
        • Gangannagaripalli JB
        • et al.
        Assessing patient-centred outcomes in lateral elbow tendinopathy: a systematic review and standardised comparison of English language clinical rating systems.
        Sport Med Open. 2019; 5: 10https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-019-0183-2
        • Rompe JD
        • Overend TJ
        • MacDermid JC.
        Validation of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire.
        J Hand Ther. 2007; 20: 3-11https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.003
        • Hefford C
        • Abbott JH
        • Arnold R
        • Baxter GD.
        The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 42: 56-65https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3953
        • Seltman HJ.
        Mixed models.
        Experimental Design and Analysis. 2018: 357-375
        • Struijs PAA
        • Korthals-De Bos IBC
        • Van Tulder MW
        • Van Dijk CN
        • Bouter LM
        • Assendelft WJJ.
        Cost effectiveness of brace, physiotherapy, or both for treatment of tennis elbow.
        Br J Sports Med. 2006; 40: 637-643https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.026187
        • Korthals-De Bos IBC
        • Smidt N
        • Van Tulder MW
        • et al.
        Cost effectiveness of interventions for lateral epicondylitis: results from a randomised controlled trial in primary care.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2004; 22: 185-195https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200422030-00004
        • Williams RM
        • Westmorland MG
        • Schmuck G
        • MacDermid JC.
        Effectiveness of workplace rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of work-related upper extremity disorders: a systematic review.
        J Hand Ther. 2004; 17: 267-273https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.012
        • Hoosain M
        • de Klerk S
        • Burger M.
        Workplace-based rehabilitation of upper limb conditions: a systematic review.
        J Occup Rehabil. 2019; 29: 175-193https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9777-7
        • Van Eerd D
        • Munhall C
        • Irvin E
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of workplace interventions in the prevention of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders and symptoms: an update of the evidence.
        Occup Environ Med. 2016; 73: 62-70https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-102992
      3. WorkCover WA. Worker's compensation in Western Australia annual statistical report 2010/11 to 2013/14. Available at: https://www.workcover.wa.gov.au. 2015. Accessed September 17, 2017.

        • McQueen KS
        • Powell RK
        • Keener T
        • Whalley R
        • Calfee RP.
        Role of strengthening during nonoperative treatment of lateral epicondyle tendinopathy.
        J Hand Ther. 2020; : 1-7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2020.10.009
        • Stasinopoulos D
        • Stasinopoulos I.
        Comparison of effects of eccentric training, eccentric-concentric training, and eccentric-concentric training combined with isometric contraction in the treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy.
        J Hand Ther. 2017; 30: 13-19https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2016.09.001
        • Chen Z
        • Baker NA.
        Effectiveness of eccentric strengthening in the treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
        J Hand Ther. 2020; 34: 18-28https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2020.02.002
        • Hudak PL
        • Cole DC
        • Haines AT.
        Understanding prognosis to improve rehabilitation: the example of lateral elbow pain.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77: 586-593https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90300-7
        • Hong Q.
        Treatment of lateral epicondylitis: where is the evidence?.
        Jt Bone Spine. 2003; 71: 369-373https://doi.org/10.1016/S1297-319X(03)00167-2
        • Smidt N
        • Assendelft WJJ
        • Arola H
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of physiotherapy, for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review.
        Ann Med. 2003; 35: 51-62https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890310004138
        • Waugh EJ.
        Lateral epicondylalgia or epicondylitis: what's in a name?.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005; 35: 200-202https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.0104
        • Bhabra G
        • Wang A
        • Ebert JR
        • Edwards P
        • Zheng M
        • Zheng MH.
        Lateral elbow tendinopathy: development of a pathophysiology-based treatment algorithm.
        Orthop J Sport Med. 2016; 4: 1-10https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116670635
        • Shiri R
        • Viikari-Juntura E
        • Varonen H
        • Heliovaara M.
        Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: a population study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 164: 1065-1074https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj325
        • Herquelot E
        • Bodin J
        • Roquelaure Y
        • et al.
        Work-related risk factors for lateral epicondylitis and other cause of elbow pain in the working population.
        Am J Ind Med. 2013; 56: 400-409https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22140
        • Descatha A
        • Dale AM
        • Jaegers L
        • Herquelot E
        • Evanoff B.
        Self-reported physical exposure association with medial and lateral epicondylitis incidence in a large longitudinal study.
        Occup Environ Med. 2013; 70: 670-673https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2012-101341
        • Bateman M
        • Whitby E
        • Kacha S
        • Salt E
        Current physiotherapy practice in the management of tennis elbow: a service evaluation.
        Musculoskelet Care. 2018; 16: 322-326https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1236
        • Greenfield C
        • Webster V.
        Chronic lateral epicondylitis.
        Physiotherapy. 2002; 88: 578-594https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60510-X

      JHT Read for Credit

      Quiz: # 896

      Record your answers on the Return Answer Form found on the tear-out coupon at the back of this issue or to complete online and use a credit card, go to JHTReadforCredit.com. There is only one best answer for each question.
      • # 1.
        Outcome measures include
        • a.
          grip
        • b.
          function
        • c.
          pain
        • d.
          all of the above
      • # 2.
        The study design is
        • a.
          pilot project
        • b.
          retrospective cohort
        • c.
          RCTs
        • d.
          case series
      • # 3.
        Participating therapists
        • a.
          attended a preliminary training session
        • b.
          attended a 10 session training course
        • c.
          received a bonus stipend of $500
        • d.
          were all females
      • # 4.
        Ergonomics were addressed in Stage
        • a.
          4
        • b.
          3
        • c.
          2
        • d.
          1
      • # 5.
        The experimental group showed significantly better outcomes than the control group
        • a.
          true
        • b.
          false
      When submitting to the HTCC for re-certification, please batch your JHT RFC certificates in groups of 3 or more to get full credit.