Advertisement
Full Length Article| Volume 35, ISSUE 4, P541-551, October 2022

Download started.

Ok

Diagnostic accuracy of examination tests for lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) – A systematic review

Published:February 27, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.02.002

      Highlights

      • Cozen's test and grip strength difference between elbow flexion and extension provide high accuracy for the diagnosis of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET).
      • Substantial heterogeneity in inclusion criteria, type of equipment, examiner/operator, mode of application and reference standards limit the internal and external validity of the results in diagnostic studies of LET.
      • Sonoelastography, Grayscale Doppler Ultrasound Imaging and MRI provide variable diagnostic accuracy range depending on the entities reported and should be cautiously considered in LET if differential diagnosis is indicated.

      Abstract

      Background

      Reviews on the diagnostic performance of the examination tests for lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) based on updated context-specific tools and guidelines are missing.

      Purpose

      To review the diagnostic accuracy of examination tests used in LET.

      Design

      Systematic review following PRISMA-DTA guidelines.

      Methods

      We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library databases. The QUADAS-2 checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of the eligible studies. We included diagnostic studies reporting the accuracy of physical examination tests or imaging modalities used in patients with LET.

      Results

      Twenty-four studies with 1370 participants were identified reporting the diagnostic performance of Ultrasound Imaging (USI) (18 studies), physical examination tests (2 studies) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (4 studies). Most studies (97%) were assessed with “unclear” or “high risk” of bias. Sonoelastography showed the highest sensitivity (75- 100%) and specificity (85- 96%). Grayscale with or without Doppler USI presented poor to excellent values (sensitivity: 53%-100%, specificity: 42%-90%). MRI performed better in the diagnosis of tendon thickening and enthesopathy (sensitivity and specificity: 81%-100%). The Cozen's test reported high sensitivity (91%) while a grip strength difference of 5%-10% between elbow flexion and extension showed high sensitivity (78%-83%) and specificity (80%-90%).

      Conclusions

      Cozen's test and grip strength measurement present high accuracy in the diagnosis of LET but are poorly investigated. USI and MRI provide variable diagnostic accuracy depending on the entities reported and should be recommended with caution when differential diagnosis is necessary. Substantial heterogeneity was found in inclusion criteria, operator/ examiner, mode of application, type of equipment and reference standards across the studies.

      Systematic review registration

      PROSPERO ID CRD42020160402

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bhabra G.
        • et al.
        Lateral elbow tendinopathy: development of a pathophysiology-based treatment algorithm.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2016; 4 (2325967116670635-2325967116670635)https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116670635
        • Shiri R.
        • Viikari-Juntura E.
        • Varonen H.
        • Heliövaara M.
        Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: a population study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 164: 1065-1074https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj325
        • Nirschl R.P.
        • Ashman E.S.
        Elbow tendinopathy: tennis elbow.
        Clin Sports Med. 2002; 22: 813-836https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-5919(03)00051-6
        • Walz D.M.
        • Newman J.S.
        • Konin G.P.
        • Ross G.
        Epicondylitis: pathogenesis, imaging, and treatment.
        Radiographics. 2010; 30: 167-184https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.301095078
        • Coombes B.K.
        • Bisset L.
        • Vicenzino B.
        Management of lateral elbow tendinopathy: one size does not fit all.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015; 45: 938-949https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2015.5841
      1. Lebrun, C. What Are the Best Diagnostic Criteria for Lateral Epicondylitis? Evidence-Based Orthopaedics: The Best Answers to Clinical Questions. 2009; 148-157, doi:10.1016/B978-141604444-4.50024-2.

        • Karanasios S.
        • Korakakis V.
        • Whiteley R.
        Exercise interventions in lateral elbow tendinopathy have better outcomes than passive interventions, but the effects are small: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2123 subjects in 30 trials.
        Br J Sports Med. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102525
        • Zwerus E.L.
        • et al.
        Physical examination of the elbow, what is the evidence? A systematic literature review.
        Br J Sports Med. 2018; 52: 1253-1260https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096712
        • Docking S.I.
        • Cook J.
        Pathological tendons maintain sufficient aligned fibrillar structure on ultrasound tissue characterization (UTC).
        Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016; 26: 675-683https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12491
        • McAuliffe S.
        • McCreesh K.
        • Culloty F.
        • Purtill H.
        • O'Sullivan K.
        Can ultrasound imaging predict the development of Achilles and patellar tendinopathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 1516-1523https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096288
        • De Zordo T.
        • et al.
        Real-time sonoelastography of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of findings between patients and healthy volunteers.
        AJR. Am JRoentgenol. 2010; 193: 180-185https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.2020
        • du Toit C.
        • Stieler M.
        • Saunders R.
        • Bisset L.
        • Vicenzino B.
        Diagnostic accuracy of power Doppler ultrasound in patients with chronic tennis elbow.
        Br J Sports Med. 2008; 42: 872-876https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2007.043901
        • Latham S.K.
        • Smith T.O.
        The diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for the detection of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100: 281-286https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.01.006
        • Dones V.G.K.
        • Milanese S
        • Suarez C
        • Thoirs K
        • Kumar S.
        Diagnostic value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in acute and chronic lateral epicondylalgia.
        J Allied Health Sci Practi. 2014;
        • Naaktgeboren C.A.
        • et al.
        Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies.
        BMC. 2016; (Medical Research Methodology 16, 6)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0108-4
        • Whiting P.F.
        • et al.
        QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
        Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155: 529-536https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
        • Moher D.
        • et al.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
        Syst Rev. 2015; 4: 1https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
        • Dones V.C.
        • Grimmer K.
        • Thoirs K.
        • Suarez C.G.
        • Luker J.
        The diagnostic validity of musculoskeletal ultrasound in lateral epicondylalgia: a systematic review.
        BMC Med Imaging. 2014; 14: 10https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-14-10
        • Büttner F.
        • et al.
        Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews.
        Br J Sports Med. 2020; 54: 798https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-100806
        • Docking S.I.
        • Ooi C.C.
        • Connell D.
        Tendinopathy: is imaging telling us the entire story?.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015; 45: 842-852https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2015.5880
        • McInnes M.D.F.
        • et al.
        Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement.
        JAMA. 2018; 319: 388-396https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163
        • Leeflang M.M.G.
        • Deeks J.J.
        • Takwoingi Y.
        • Macaskill P.
        Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews.
        Syst Rev. 2013; 2: 82https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-82
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        • et al.
        The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
        • Grimes D.A.
        • Schulz K.F.
        Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios.
        Lancet. 2005; 365: 1500-1505https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66422-7
        • Connell D
        • F. B.
        • Coombes P
        • et al.
        Sonographic examination of lateral epicondylitis.
        AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176: 777-782https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760777
        • Dones V.
        • Milanese S
        • Grimmer K.
        • Shanmugam K.
        The sensitivity of the provocation tests in replicating pain on the lateral elbow area of participants with lateral epicondylalgia.
        J Case Rep Clin Res Studies. 2014; 1: 1
        • Khoury V.C.E.
        Tenomalacia": a new sonographic sign of tendinopathy?.
        Eur Radiol. 2009; 19: 144-146https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1112-9
        • Levin D.
        • Nazarian L.N.
        • Miller T.T.
        • O'Kane P.L.
        • Feld R.I.
        • Parker L.
        • McShane J.M.
        Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: US findings.
        Radiology. 2009; 237: 230-234
        • Maffulli NR.R.
        • Carrillo F
        • Capasso G
        • Minelli S
        Tennis elbow: an ultrasonographic study in tennis players.
        Br J Sports Med. 1990; 24: 151-155https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.24.3.151
        • Obradov M.A.P
        Ultra sonographic findings for chronic lateral epicondylitis.
        JBR-BTR. 2012; 95: 66-70
        • Park G
        • Park J
        Diagnostic confidence of sonoelastography as adjunct to greyscale ultrasonography in lateral elbow tendinopathy.
        Chin Med J(Engl). 2014; 127: 3110-3115https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20140209
        • Tahran S.
        • Z. Ü.
        • Ovalı G.
        • Yüksel P
        Value of ultrasonography on diagnosis and assessment of pain and grip strength in patients with lateral epicondylitis.
        Turk J Rheumatol. 2009; : 24
        • Ahn K.S.
        • Kang C.H.
        • Hong S.J.
        • Jeong W.K.
        Ultrasound elastography of lateral epicondylosis: clinical feasibility of quantitative elastographic measurements.
        AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202: 1094-1099https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11003
        • Arslan S.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance of superb microvascular imaging and other sonographic modalities in the assessment of lateral epicondylosis.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2018; 37: 585-593https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14369
        • Dorf E.R.
        • Chhabra A.B.
        • Golish S.R.
        • McGinty J.L.
        • Pannunzio M.E.
        Effect of elbow position on grip strength in the evaluation of lateral epicondylitis.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 2007; 32: 882-886https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.010
        • Heales L.J.
        • Broadhurst N.
        • Mellor R.
        • Hodges P.W.
        • Vicenzino B.
        Diagnostic ultrasound imaging for lateral epicondylalgia: a case-control study.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46: 2070-2076https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000345
        • Lee M.H.
        • et al.
        Utility of sonographic measurement of the common tensor tendon in patients with lateral epicondylitis.
        AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: 1363-1367https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5769
        • Mackay D.
        The objective diagnosis of early tennis elbow by magnetic resonance imaging.
        Occup Med. 2003; 53: 309-312https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqg031
        • Noh K.H.
        • Moon Y.L.
        • Jacir A.M.
        • Kim K.H.
        • Gorthi V.
        Sonographic probe induced tenderness for lateral epicondylitis: an accurate technique to confirm the location of the lesion.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy. 2010; 18: 836-839https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-1037-0
        • Struijs P.A.
        • Spruyt M.
        • Assendelft W.J.
        • van Dijk C.N.
        The predictive value of diagnostic sonography for the effectiveness of conservative treatment of tennis elbow.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 1113-1118https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.0656
        • Toprak U.
        • et al.
        Common extensor tendon thickness measurements at the radiocapitellar region in diagnosis of lateral elbow tendinopathy.
        Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012; 18: 566-570https://doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.5575-12.2
        • Walton M.J.
        • et al.
        The reliability and validity of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of chronic lateral epicondylitis.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 2011; 36: 475-479https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.040
        • Zeisig E.
        • Ohberg L.
        • Alfredson H.
        Extensor origin vascularity related to pain in patients with Tennis elbow.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy. 2006; 14: 659-663https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0060-7
        • Zhu B.
        • You Y.
        • Xiang X.
        • Wang L.
        • Qiu L.
        Assessment of common extensor tendon elasticity in patients with lateral epicondylitis using shear wave elastography.
        Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020; 10: 211-219https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2019.10.07
        • Steinborn M.
        • Heuck A.
        • Jessel C.
        • Bonel H.
        • Reiser M.
        Magnetic resonance imaging of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow with a 0.2-T dedicated system.
        Eur Radiol. 1999; 9: 1376-1380https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050851
        • van Kollenburg J.A.
        • Brouwer K.M.
        • Jupiter J.B.
        • Ring D.
        Magnetic resonance imaging signal abnormalities in enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis longus origin.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009; 34: 1094-1098https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.023
        • Fusini F.
        • et al.
        Real-time sonoelastography: principles and clinical applications in tendon disorders. A systematic review.
        Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2018; 7: 467-477https://doi.org/10.11138/mltj/2017.7.3.467
        • Wu C.-H.
        • Chen W.-S.
        • Park G.-Y.
        • Wang T.-G.
        • Lew H.L.
        Musculoskeletal sonoelastography: a focused review of its diagnostic applications for evaluating tendons and fascia.
        J Med Ultrasound. 2012; 20: 79-86https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmu.2012.04.006
        • Drakonaki E.E.
        • Allen G.M.
        • Wilson D.J.
        Real-time ultrasound elastography of the normal Achilles tendon: reproducibility and pattern description.
        Clin Radiol. 2009; 64: 1196-1202https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2009.08.006
        • Boyer K.
        • Wies J.
        • Turkelson C.M.
        Effects of bias on the results of diagnostic studies of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009; 34: 1006-1013https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.018
        • Gagnier J.J.
        • Moher D.
        • Boon H.
        • Beyene J.
        • Bombardier C.
        Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature.
        BMC Med Res Method. 2012; 12: 111https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-111
        • Mulherin S.A.
        • Miller W.C.
        Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation.
        Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 598-602https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-7-200210010-00011
        • Saroja G.
        • Aseer P.A.L.
        • P M, V. S
        Diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests in lateral epicondylitis.
        Int J Physiother Res. 2014; 2: 815-823https://doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2014.699
        • Matthews W.
        • Ellis R.
        • Furness J.
        • Hing W.
        Classification of tendon matrix change using ultrasound imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018; 44: 2059-2080https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.022
        • Cook J.L.
        • Rio E.
        • Purdam C.R.
        • Docking S.I.
        Revisiting the continuum model of tendon pathology: what is its merit in clinical practice and research?.
        Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 1187-1191https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095422
        • Klauser A.S.
        • Peetrons P.
        Developments in musculoskeletal ultrasound and clinical applications.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2010; 39: 1061-1071https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0782-y
        • Rasmussen O.S.
        Sonography of tendons.
        Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000; 10: 360-364https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010006360.x
        • Allen G.M.
        Shoulder ultrasound imaging-integrating anatomy, biomechanics and disease processes.
        Eur J Radiol. 2008; 68: 137-146https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.024
        • Smith T.O.
        • Back T.
        • Toms A.P.
        • Hing C.B.
        Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Clin Radiol. 2011; 66: 1036-1048https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.007
        • Schunemann H.J.
        • et al.
        Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.
        BMJ. 2008; 336: 1106-1110https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE
        • Brasseur J.L.
        • et al.
        Ultrasonographic rotator-cuff changes in veteran tennis players: the effect of hand dominance and comparison with clinical findings.
        Eur Radiol. 2004; 14: 857-864https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2116-0
        • Krogh T.P.
        • Fredberg U.
        • Christensen R.
        • Stengaard-Pedersen K.
        • Ellingsen T.
        Ultrasonographic assessment of tendon thickness, Doppler activity and bony spurs of the elbow in patients with lateral epicondylitis and healthy subjects: a reliability and agreement study.
        Ultraschall Med. 2013; 34: 468-474https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1335951
        • Meroni R.
        • et al.
        Ultrasonography of the shoulder: asymptomatic findings from working-age women in the general population.
        J Phys Ther Sci. 2017; 29: 1219-1223https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.1219
        • Cook J.L.
        • Khan K.M.
        • Kiss Z.S.
        • Coleman B.D.
        • Griffiths L.
        Asymptomatic hypoechoic regions on patellar tendon ultrasound: a 4-year clinical and ultrasound followup of 46 tendons.
        Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001; 11: 321-327https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2001.110602.x
        • Fredberg U.
        • Bolvig L.
        Significance of ultrasonographically detected asymptomatic tendinosis in the patellar and Achilles tendons of elite soccer players: a longitudinal study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30: 488-491https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465020300040701
        • Giombini A.
        • et al.
        Asymptomatic Achilles, patellar, and quadriceps tendinopathy: a longitudinal clinical and ultrasonographic study in elite fencers.
        Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013; 23: 311-316https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01400.x
        • Hirschmüller A.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of Achilles tendon Doppler sonography in asymptomatic runners.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44: 199-205https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31822b7318
        • Khan K.M.
        • Maffulli N.
        • Coleman B.D.
        • Cook J.L.
        • Taunton J.E.
        Patellar tendinopathy: some aspects of basic science and clinical management.
        Br J Sports Med. 1998; 32: 346-355https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.32.4.346
        • Leung J.L.Y.
        • Griffith J.F
        Sonography of chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a case–control study.
        J Clin Ultrasound. 2008; 36: 27-32https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20388
        • Bisset L.M.
        • Vicenzino B.
        Physiotherapy management of lateral epicondylalgia.
        J Physiother. 2015; 61: 174-181https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.015
        • Vicenzino B.
        • et al.
        ICON 2019—International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: there are nine core health-related domains for tendinopathy (CORE DOMAINS): Delphi study of healthcare professionals and patients.
        Br J Sports Med. 2020; 54: 444https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-100894
        • Grimaldi A.
        • et al.
        Utility of clinical tests to diagnose MRI-confirmed gluteal tendinopathy in patients presenting with lateral hip pain.
        Br J Sports Med. 2017; 51: 519-524https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096175
        • Hutchison A.M.
        • et al.
        What is the best clinical test for Achilles tendinopathy?.
        Foot Ankle Surg. 2013; 19: 112-117https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2012.12.006
        • Malliaras P.
        • Purdam C.
        • Maffulli N.
        • Cook J.
        Temporal sequence of greyscale ultrasound changes and their relationship with neovascularity and pain in the patellar tendon.
        Br J Sports Med. 2010; 44: 944-947https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.054916

      JHT Read for Credit

      Quiz: # 917

      Record your answers on the Return Answer Form found on the tear-out coupon at the back of this issue or to complete online and use a credit card, go to JHTReadforCredit.com. There is only one best answer for each question.
      • # 1.
        The study design is
        • a.
          RCTs
        • b.
          systematic review
        • c.
          prospective cohort
        • d.
          case series
      • # 2.
        Diagnostic performance of _____________ was investigated
        • a.
          MRI
        • b.
          USI
        • c.
          physical examination
        • d.
          all of the above
      • # 3.
        LET is seen
        • a.
          more frequently in the UK than in the US
        • b.
          in women more frequently than in men
        • c.
          in men as frequently as in women
        • d.
          in men more frequently than in women
      • # 4.
        Both ___________ and ___________ were calculated for each Dx tool
        • a.
          ease of use and cost
        • b.
          specificity and sensitivity
        • c.
          selectivity and specificity
        • d.
          reliability and validity
      • # 5.
        Cozen's Test and grip strength were highly inaccurate tools in diagnosing LET
        • a.
          not true
        • b.
          true
      When submitting to the HTCC for re-certification, please batch your JHT RFC certificates in groups of 3 or more to get full credit.