Advertisement
Scientific/Clinical Article| Volume 34, ISSUE 4, P543-548, October 2021

Concurrent musculoskeletal complaints in elbows, shoulders, and necks after common hand and forearm injuries or conditions: A cross-sectional study among 600 patients

Published:September 03, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2020.05.002

      Highlights

      • Prevalence of concurrent MSCs in patients with hand/forearm injury or condition.
      • The prevalence of concurrent MSCs in elbows, shoulders, and necks was 40% in this population.
      • More than one in four patients developed MSCs after their hand/forearm injury or condition.
      • Clinicians should be aware of the high prevalence of concurrent MSCs.

      Abstract

      Study design

      This is a cross-sectional study among 600 patients.

      Introduction

      Isolated hand and forearm injuries or conditions are common in the emergency and orthopedic departments. So far, little is known about whether these patients suffer from concurrent musculoskeletal complaints (MSCs) besides their hand and forearm complaints. Neglecting concurrent MSCs in the upper limbs and necks could hamper rehabilitation and prolong the time taken to return to daily and work-related activities.

      Purpose of the study

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of concurrent MSCs in the elbow, shoulder, and neck after common hand and/or forearm injuries or conditions.

      Methods

      This study included 600 patients with any type of diagnosis referred to rehabilitation after hand and/or forearm injuries or conditions. Basic characteristics, diagnoses, and location of patients' symptoms were collected and analyzed.

      Results

      The overall prevalence of concurrent MSCs was 40%. Twenty-eight percent of the whole sample developed concurrent MSCs after the hand and forearm injury or condition. The gender distribution was 68% women and 32% men. The most common location for complaints was the shoulder (62%), followed by the elbow (49%), and the neck (32%).

      Discussion

      The present results suggest that MSCs from the elbows, shoulders, or necks are very common in patients with hand and/or forearm injuries or conditions.

      Conclusion

      Clinicians treating patients with isolated hand and forearm injuries or conditions should be aware of the high prevalence of concurrent MSCs. Future research should investigate if specific rehabilitation, focusing on concurrent MSCs, may influence the outcome in this population.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • de Putter C.E.
        • Selles R.W.
        • Polinder S.
        • Panneman M.J.M.
        • Hovius S.E.R.
        • Beeck E.F.
        Economic impact of hand and wrist injuries: healthcare costs and productivity costs in a population-based study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: e56
        • Polinder S.
        • Iordens G.I.
        • Panneman M.J.
        • et al.
        Trends in incidence and costs of injuries to the shoulder, arm and wrist in The Netherlands between 1986 and 2008.
        BMC Public Health. 2013; 13: 531
        • Larsen C.F.
        • Mulder S.
        • Johansen A.M.T.
        • et al.
        The epidemiology of hand injuries in The Netherlands and Denmark.
        Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19: 323
        • Wenzinger E.
        • Rivera-Barrios A.
        • Gonzalez G.
        • Herrera F.
        Trends in upper extremity injuries presenting to US emergency departments.
        Hand (N Y). 2017; : 408-412
        • Hey H.W.D.
        • Seet C.M.
        Hand injuries seen at an emergency department in Singapore.
        Eur J Emerg Med. 2010; 17: 343-345
        • MacIntyre N.J.
        • Dewan N.
        Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis.
        J Hand Ther. 2016; 29: 136-145
        • Gustafsson M.
        • Ahlström G.
        Problems experienced during the first year of an acute traumatic hand injury – a prospective study.
        J Clin Nurs. 2004; 13: 986-995
        • Robinson L.S.
        • Sarkies M.
        • Brown T.
        • O'Brien L.
        Direct, indirect and intangible costs of acute hand and wrist injuries: a systematic review.
        Injury. 2016; 47: 2614-2626
        • Rosberg H.C.
        • Carlsson K.C.
        • Dahlin L.B.
        Prospective study of patients with injuries to the hand and forearm: costs, function, and general health.
        Scand J Plastic Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005; 39: 360-369
        • Sindhu K.
        • DeFroda S.F.
        • Harris A.P.
        • Gil J.A.
        Management of partial fingertip amputation in adults: operative and non-operative treatment.
        Injury. 2017; 48: 2643-2649
        • Miller L.
        • Crosbie J.
        • Wajon A.
        • Ada L.
        No difference between two types of exercise after proximal phalangeal fracture fixation: a randomised trial.
        J Physiother. 2016; 62: 12-19
        • Yammine K.
        • Harvey A.
        Antegrade intramedullary nailing for fifth metacarpal neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 24: 273-278
        • Alshryda S.
        • Shah A.
        • Odak S.
        • Al-Shryda J.
        • Ilango B.
        • Murali S.R.
        Acute fractures of the scaphoid bone: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Surgeon. 2012; 10: 218-229
        • Ju J.H.
        • Jin G.Z.
        • Li G.X.
        • Hu H.Y.
        • Hou R.X.
        Comparison of treatment outcomes between nonsurgical and surgical treatment of distal radius fracture in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015; 400: 767-779
        • Roll S.C.
        • Hardison M.E.
        Effectiveness of occupational Therapy interventions for adults with musculoskeletal conditions of the forearm, wrist, and hand: a systematic review.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2017; 71 (7101180010p1-7101180010p12)
        • Barai A.
        • Lambie B.
        • Cosgrave C.
        • Baxter J.
        Management of distal radius fractures in the emergency department: a long-term functional outcome measure study with the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores.
        Emerg Med Australas. 2018; 30: 530-537
        • Kuret Z.
        • Burger H.
        • Vidmar G.
        Influence of finger amputation on grip strength and objectively measured hand function: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
        Int J Rehabil Res. 2015; 38: 181-188
        • Stinton S.B.
        • Graham P.L.
        • Moloney N.A.
        • Maclachlan L.R.
        • Edgar D.W.
        • Pappas E.
        Longitudinal recovery following distal radial fractures managed with volar plate fixation.
        Bone Joint J. 2017; 12: 1665-1676
        • Magni N.E.
        • McNair P.J.
        • Rice D.A.
        The effects of resistance training on muscle strength, joint pain, and hand function in individuals with hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Arthritis Res Ther. 2017; 19: 131
        • Vicenzino B.
        • Collins D.
        • Wright A.
        The initial effects of a cervical spine manipulative physiotherapy treatment on the pain and dysfunction of lateral epicondylalgia.
        Pain. 1996; 68: 69
        • Lucado A.M.
        • Kolber M.J.
        • Cheng M.S.
        • Ecternach J.L.
        Subacromial impingement syndrome and lateral epicondylalgia in tennis players.
        Phys Ther Rev. 2010; 15: 55-61
        • Molgaard C.
        • Rathleff M.S.
        • Simonsen O.
        Patellofemoral pain syndrome and its association with hip, ankle, and foot function in 16- to 18-year-old high school students: a single blind case–control study.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2011; 101: 215-222
        • Berglund K.M.
        • Persson B.H.
        • Denison E.
        Prevalence of pain and dysfunction in the cervical and thoracic spine in persons with and without lateral elbow pain.
        Man Ther Vol. 2008; 13
        • Sueki D.G.
        • Cleland J.A.
        • Wainner R.S.
        A regional interdependence model of musculoskeletal dysfunction: research, mechanisms, and clinical implications.
        J Man Manip Ther. 2013; 21: 90-102
        • Handoll H.H.G.
        • Elliott J.
        Rehabilitation for distal radial fractures in adults.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; : CD003324
        • Bertozzi L.
        • Valdes K.
        • Vanti C.
        • Negrini S.
        • Pillastrini P.
        • Villafañe J.G.
        Investigation of the effect of conservative interventions in thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37: 2025-2043
        • Huisstede B.M.
        • Wijnhoven H.A.
        • Bierma-Zeinstra S.M.
        • Koes B.W.
        • Verhaar J.A.
        • Picavet S.
        Prevalence and characteristics of complaints of the arm, neck, and/or shoulder (CANS) in the open population.
        Clin J Pain. 2008; 24: 253-259
        • Bouma S.E.
        • Postema S.G.
        • Bongers R.M.
        • Dijkstra P.U.
        • van der Sluis C.K.
        Musculoskeletal complaints in individuals with finger or partial hand amputations in The Netherlands: a cross-sectional study.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 40: 1146-1153
        • Fuglkjær S.
        • Dissing K.B.
        • Hestbæk L.
        Prevalence and incidence of musculoskeletal extremity complaints in children and adolescents. A systematic review.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18: 418
        • Bot S.D.
        • van der Waal J.M.
        • Terwee C.B.
        • et al.
        Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64: 118-123
        • Kok L.M.
        • Nelissen R.G.
        • Huisstede B.M.
        Prevalence and consequences of arm, neck, and/or shoulder complaints among music academy students: a comparative study.
        Med Probl Perform Art. 2015; 30: 163-168
        • Sundstrup E.
        • Jakobsen M.D.
        • Jay K.
        • Brandt M.
        • Andersen L.L.
        High intensity physical exercise and pain in the neck and upper limb among slaughterhouse workers: cross-sectional study.
        Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 218546
        • Elm von E.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Egger M.
        • et al.
        The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 344-349
        • Walker-Bone K.
        • Palmer K.T.
        • Reading I.
        • Coggon D.
        • Cooper C.
        Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 51: 642-651
        • Andersen L.L.
        • Clausen T.
        • Carneiro I.G.
        • Holtermann A.
        Spreading of chronic pain between body regions: prospective cohort study among health care workers.
        Eur J Pain. 2012; 16: 1437-1443
        • Graven-Nielsen T.
        • Arendt-Nielsen L.
        Assessment of mechanisms in localized and widespread musculoskeletal pain.
        Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010; 6: 599-606
        • Luchetti R.
        • Atzei A.
        • Cozzolino R.
        • Fairplay T.
        • Badur N.
        Comparison between open and arthroscopic-assisted foveal triangular fibrocartilage complex repair for post-traumatic distal radio-ulnar joint instability.
        J Hand Surg Eur. 2014; 39: 845-855

      JHT Read for Credit

      Quiz: # 792

      Record your answers on the Return Answer Form found on the tear-out coupon at the back of this issue or to complete online and use a credit card, go to JHTReadforCredit.com. There is only one best answer for each question.
      • # 1.
        The prevalence of concurrent MSCs was
        • a.
          10%
        • b.
          20%
        • c.
          40%
        • d.
          60%
      • # 2.
        The occurrence of concurrent MSCs was
        • a.
          more prevalent in females
        • b.
          more prevalent in males
        • c.
          was essentially the same in men and women
        • d.
          was virtually non-existent in football players
      • # 3.
        The most common region for a concurrent MSC was the
        • a.
          hand
        • b.
          wrist
        • c.
          elbow
        • d.
          shoulder
      • # 4.
        Inclusion in the study as a patient with concurrent MSC was determined through
        • a.
          a computer model specifically designed for this investigation
        • b.
          a physical examination by the referring physician
        • c.
          an interview of the patient
        • d.
          a committee vote
      • # 5.
        The authors present data showing that focusing on the concurrent MSC will significantly improve the outcome in most cases of isolated hand injuries
        • a.
          true
        • b.
          false
      When submitting to the HTCC for re-certification, please batch your JHT RFC certificates in groups of 3 or more to get full credit.