Advertisement
Scientific/Clinical Article| Volume 32, ISSUE 3, P297-304, July 2019

Comparison of the effectiveness of orthotic intervention, kinesiotaping, and paraffin treatments in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: A single-blind and randomized controlled study

Published:February 17, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2017.12.006

      Highlights

      • Three-month usage of orthotic device at night provides clinical, electrophysiological, and ultrasonographical recovery in carpal tunnel syndrome patients, and this improvement can be preserved for up to 6 months.
      • Orthotic intervention plus kinesiotaping provides better results on reducing pain and endoneural edema compared to use of a night orthotic, especially in mild carpal tunnel syndrome patients, and this superiority can last for up to 6 months.
      • Six-month follow-up was a challenge in this study.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The aim of the study was to compare different conservative treatments in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

      Study Design

      A single-blind randomized controlled study.

      Methods

      Patients (n = 169) diagnosed with mild or moderate CTS were screened; 110 met study requirements. The patients were randomized into 3 groups. The control (CON) comparison provided to all patients was a fabricated night orthotic which held the wrist in a neutral position. The second group received adjunctive kinesiotaping (KIN) and the third group received paraffin (PARA). All patients were evaluated clinically, electrophysiologically, and ultrasonographically before treatment and at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.

      Results

      There were 36 patients in CON, 37 in KIN, and 37 in PARA. Pain reduction in KIN was better than the other groups at 3 weeks (mean difference [MD] in CON 2.4 ± 2.5, KIN 3.7 ± 2.0, PARA 2.7 ± 2.3; P < .01) and 6 months (MD in CON 3.4 ± 3.0, KIN 4.9 ± 3.1, PARA 3.7 ± 2.9; P < .05). KIN pain reduction was better than CON at 3 months (MD in CON 3.8 ± 2.8, KIN 5.0 ± 2.5; P < .05). Reduction of the cross-sectional area of median nerve at the level of radioulnar joint was greater for KIN than CON at 3 weeks (MD in CON 0.0 ± 0.5, KIN 0.3 ± 0.7; P < .01) than PARA at 3 months (MD in KIN 0.3 ± 0.8, PARA 0.0 ± 0.8; P < .05) and both groups at 6 months (MD in CON 0.1 ± 0.8, KIN 0.5 ± 0.9, PARA 0.0 ± 1.0 P < .05).

      Conclusion

      Adding KIN to night use of an orthotic was more effective in achieving symptomatic and structural improvements than either the orthotic alone or adjunctive use of paraffin in patients with mild and moderate CTS.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Oh S.J.
        Anatomical and physiological basis for electromyography studies.
        in: Oh S.J. Clinical Electromyography Nerve Conduction Studies. Wilkins and Wilkins, Baltimore1993: 3-14
        • Aroori S.
        • Spence R.A.J.
        Carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Ulster Med J. 2008; 77: 6-17
        • Hormann M.
        • Traxler H.
        • Ba-Ssalamah A.
        • et al.
        Correlative high-resolution MR-anatomic study of sciatic, ulnar and proper palmar digital nerve.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 2003; 21: 879-895
        • Carlson Hans
        • Colbert A.
        • Frydl J.
        • Arnall E.
        • Elliot M.
        • Carlson N.
        Current options for nonsurgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Int J Clin Rheumtol. 2010; 5: 129-142
        • O'Connor D.
        • Marshall S.
        • Massy-Westropp N.
        Non-surgical treatment (other than steroid injection) for carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; : CD003219
        • McClure P.
        Evidence-based practice: an example related to the use of splinting in a patient with carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Ther. 2003; 16: 256-263
        • Thomas M.A.
        • Felsenthal G.
        • Fast A.
        • Young M.
        Peripheral neuropathy.
        in: DeLisa J.A. Gans B.M. Walsh N.E. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 4th ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia2005: 895-911
        • Chang Y.
        • Hsieh S.
        • Horng Y.
        • Chen H.L.
        • Lee K.C.
        • Horng Y.S.
        Comparative effectiveness of ultrasound and paraffin therapy in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized trial.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15: 399
        • Kase K.
        • Wallis J.
        • Kase T.
        Clinical therapeutic applications of the kinesio taping method.
        Ken Ikai Co. Ltd., Tokyo2003
        • Oncu J.
        • Iliser R.
        • Koymen Yilmaz F.
        • Kuran B.
        Efficacy of kinesiotaping on symptoms, hand functions, and hand grip strength in carpal tunnel syndrome: a single-blind and randomized controlled study.
        Turk J Phys Med Rehab. 2014; 60: 43-51
        • Ashford R.F.
        • Nagelburg S.
        • Adkins R.
        Sensitivity of the jamar dynamometer in detecting submaximal grip effort.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1996; 21: 402-405
        • Levine D.W.
        • Simmons B.P.
        • Koris M.J.
        • et al.
        A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75: 1585-1592
        • Sezgin M.
        • Incel N.A.
        • Serhan S.
        • Camdeviren H.
        • As I.
        • Erdoğan C.
        Assessment of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: reliability and functionality of the Turkish version of the Boston questionnaire.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28: 1281-1285
        • Werner R.A.
        • Andrary M.
        Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. AANEM Monograph.
        Muscle Nerve. 2011; 44: 597-607
        • Page M.J.
        • Massy-Westropp N.
        • O'Connor D.
        • Pitt V.
        Splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; : CD010003
        • Manente G.
        • Torrieri F.
        • Di Blasio F.
        • Staniscia T.
        • Romano F.
        • Uncini A.
        An innovative hand brace for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
        Muscle Nerve. 2001; 24: 1020-1025
        • Premoselli S.
        • Sioli P.
        • Grossi A.
        • Cerry C.
        Neutral wrist splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome: a 3- and 6-month clinical and neurophysiologic follow-up evaluation of night-only splint therapy.
        Euro Medicophys. 2006; 42: 121-126
        • Soyupek F.
        • Yesildag A.
        • Kutluhan S.
        • et al.
        Determining the effectiveness of various treatment modalities in carpal tunnel syndrome by ultrasonography and comparing ultrasonographic findings with other outcomes.
        Rheumatol Int. 2012; 32: 3229-3234
        • Beekman R.
        • Vısser L.H.
        Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical rewiew of the literature.
        Muscle Nerve. 2003; 27: 26-33
        • Horng Y.S.
        • Hsieh S.F.
        • Tu Y.K.
        • Lin M.C.
        • Horng Y.S.
        • Wang J.D.
        The comperative effectiveness of tendon and nerve gliding exercises in patient with carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized trial.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 90: 435-442
        • Halseth T.
        • Mcchesney J.W.
        • Debeliso M.
        • Vaughn R.
        • Lien J.
        The effects of kinesio taping on proprioception at the ankle.
        J Sports Sci Med. 2004; 3: 1-7
        • Ibrahim I.
        • Khan W.S.
        • Goddard N.
        • Smitham P.
        Carpal tunnel syndrome: a review of the recent literature.
        Open Orthop J. 2012; 6: 69-76
        • Werner R.A.
        • Andary M.
        Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology: review.
        Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113: 1373-1381
        • Preston D.C.
        • Shapiro B.E.
        Median neuropathy.
        in: Anatomy and Neurophysiology. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston1998: 15
        • Truini A.
        • Padua L.
        • Biasiotta A.
        • et al.
        Differential involvement of A-δ and A-β fibres in neuropathic pain related to carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Pain. 2009; 145: 105-109
        • Campero M.
        • Serra J.
        • Marchettini P.
        • Ochoa J.L.
        Ectopic impulse generation and autoexcitation in single myelinated afferent fibers in patients with peripheral neuropathy and positive sensory symptoms.
        Muscle Nerve. 1998; 21: 1661-1667
        • Willis W.D.
        Long-term potentiation in spinothalamic neurons.
        Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2002; 40: 202-214
        • Fernández-de-las-Peñas C.
        • De-la-Llave-Rincón A.I.
        • Fernández-Carnero J.
        • Cuadrado M.L.
        • Arendt-Nielsen L.
        • Pareja J.A.
        Bilateral widespread mechanical pain sensitivity in carpal tunnel syndrome: Evidence of central processing in unilateral neuropathy.
        Brain. 2009; 132: 1472-1479
        • De-la-Llave-Rincón A.I.
        • Puentedura E.J.
        • Fernández-de-las-Peñas C.
        New advances in the mechanisms and etiology of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Discov Med. 2012; 13: 343-348

      JHT Read for Credit

      Quiz: # 615

      Record your answers on the Return Answer Form found on the tear-out coupon at the back of this issue or to complete online and use a credit card, go to JHTReadforCredit.com. There is only one best answer for each question.
      • # 1.
        The study design was
        • a.
          double blind RCTs
        • b.
          single blind RTCs
        • c.
          case series
        • d.
          retrospective cohort
      • # 2.
        The subject population was
        • a.
          actual patients displaying moderate to severe CTS
        • b.
          college students with intermittent median parasthesias
        • c.
          post op CTS patients
        • d.
          actual patients diagnosed with mild to moderate CTS
      • # 3.
        All subjects received
        • a.
          kinesiotaping
        • b.
          paraffin baths
        • c.
          a night orthotic devise with the wrist held in neutral
        • d.
          dry needling
      • # 4.
        In addition to traditional assessment tools the authors evaluated the subjects using
        • a.
          qualitative techniques
        • b.
          ultrasonography
        • c.
          manual therapy techniques
        • d.
          MRI
      • # 5.
        The authors concluded that kinesiotaping was an effective adjunctive intervention to the control group
        • a.
          true
        • b.
          false
      When submitting to the HTCC for re-certification, please batch your JHT RFC certificates in groups of 3 or more to get full credit.