Functional range of motion of the hand joints in activities of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Published:February 19, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2016.08.001

      Abstract

      Study Design

      Cross-sectional research design.

      Introduction

      Active range of motion (AROM) is used as indicator of hand function. However, functional range of motion (FROM) data are limited, and fail to represent activities of daily living (ADL).

      Purpose of the Study

      To estimate dominant hand FROM in flexion, abduction and palmar arching in people under 50 years of age performing ADL.

      Methods

      AROMs and hand postures in 24 representative ADL of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) were recorded in 12 men and 12 women. FROM data were reported by activity and ICF area, and compared with AROMs. The relationship between ROM measures to gender and hand size was analyzed by correlation.

      Results

      FROM was 5° to 28° less than available AROM depending on the joint and movement performed.

      Discussion

      Joints do not necessarily move through full AROM while performing ADL which has benefits in retaining function despite loss of motion. This may also suggest that ADL alone are insufficient to retain or restore full AROM.

      Conclusions

      Therapists should consider FROM requirements and normal AROM when defining hand therapy goals, interventions and evaluating the success of treatment.

      Level of Evidence

      N/A.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and PersonalCorporate R&D Professionals
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Michlovitz S.L.
        • Ann Harris B.
        • Watkins M.P.
        Therapy interventions for improving joint range of motion: a systematic review.
        J Hand Ther. 2004; 17: 118-131
        • Clarkson H.M.
        Musculoskeletal Assessment: Joint Motion and Muscle Testing (Musculoskeletal Assessment).
        3rd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Alberta, Canada2012
        • Lee K.-S.
        • Jung M.-C.
        Ergonomic evaluation of biomechanical hand function.
        Saf Health Work. 2015; 6: 9-17
        • Vasen A.P.
        • Lacey S.H.
        • Keith M.W.
        • Shaffer J.W.
        Functional range of motion of th elbow.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1995; 20: 288-292
        • Ryu J.Y.
        • Cooney W.P.
        • Askew L.J.
        • An K.N.
        • Chao E.Y.
        Functional ranges of motion of the wrist joint.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1991; 16: 409-419
        • Sardelli M.
        • Tashjian R.Z.
        • MacWilliams B.A.
        Functional elbow range of motion for contemporary tasks.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 471-477
        • Namdari S.
        • Yagnik G.
        • Ebaugh D.D.
        • et al.
        Defining functional shoulder range of motion for activities of daily living.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 1177-1183
        • Hume M.C.
        • Gellman H.
        • McKellop H.
        • Brumfield R.H.
        Functional range of motion of the joints of the hand.
        J Hand Surg Am. 1990; 15: 240-243
        • Hayashi H.
        • Shimizu H.
        Essential motion of metacarpophalangeal joints during activities of daily living.
        J Hand Ther. 2013; 26: 69-74
        • Bain G.I.
        • Polites N.
        • Higgs B.G.
        • Heptinstall R.J.
        • McGrath A.M.
        The functional range of motion of the finger joints.
        J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015; 40: 406-411
        • Coupier J.
        • Hamoudi S.
        • Telese-Izzi S.
        • Feipel V.
        • Rooze M.
        • Van Sint Jan S.
        A novel method for in-vivo evaluation of finger kinematics including definition of healthy motion patterns.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016; 31: 47-58
        • Aizawa J.
        • Masuda T.
        • Koyama T.
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional motion of the upper extremity joints during various activities of daily living.
        J Biomech. 2010; 43: 2915-2922
        • Magermans D.J.
        • Chadwick E.K.J.
        • Veeger H.E.J.
        • van der Helm F.C.T.
        Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005; 20: 591-599
        • Li Z.-M.M.
        • Tang J.
        Coordination of thumb joints during opposition.
        J Biomech. 2007; 40: 502-510
        • Santello M.
        • Soechting J.F.
        Gradual molding of the hand to object contours.
        J Neurophysiol. 1998; 79: 1307-1320
      1. WHO|International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Accessed August 3, 2015.

        • Gracia-Ibáñez V.
        • Vergara M.
        • Buffi J.H.
        • Murray W.M.
        • Sancho-Bru J.L.
        Across-subject calibration of an instrumented glove to measure hand movement for clinical purposes.
        Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2016; 20: 587-597
        • Tubiana R.
        Traité de Chirurgie de La Main.
        Masson, Paris, France1980
        • Cerveri P.
        • De Momi E.
        • Marchente M.
        • et al.
        In vivo validation of a realistic kinematic model for the trapezio-metacarpal joint using an optoelectronic system.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 2008; 36: 1268-1280
        • Dumas R.
        • Cheze L.
        • Fayet M.
        • Rumelhart C.
        • Comtet J.J.
        How to define the joint movements unambiguously:Proposal of standardization for the trapezometacarpal joint.
        Chir Main. 2008; 27: 195-201
        • Hoppenfeld S.
        • Hutton R.
        Physical examination of the spine and extremities.
        Prentice-Hall, USA1976
        • Kurillo G.
        • Chen A.
        • Bajcsy R.
        • Han J.J.
        Evaluation of upper extremity reachable workspace using Kinect camera.
        Technol Heal Care. 2013; 21: 641-656
        • Pham H.T.
        • Pathirana P.N.
        • Caelli T.
        Functional range of movement of the hand: declination angles to reachable space.
        Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014; 2014: 6230-6233
        • Hayashi H.
        • Shimizu H.
        • Okumura S.
        • Miwa K.
        Necessary metacarpophalangeal joints range of motion to maintain hand function.
        Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2014; 24: 51-55
        • Sears E.D.
        • Chung K.C.
        Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35e: 30-37

      JHT Read for Credit

       Quiz: #495

      Record your answers on the Return Answer Form found on the tear-out coupon at the back of this issue or to complete online and use a credit card, go to JHTReadforCredit.com. There is only one best answer for each question.
      • #1.
        The study data are
        • a.
          qualitative
        • b.
          quantitative
        • c.
          not supported by statistical analysis
        • d.
          clinically insignificant
      • #2.
        The investigators looked at patients during the performance of _______ specific ADL
        • a.
          5
        • b.
          10
        • c.
          45
        • d.
          24
      • #3.
        In general the
        • a.
          s_AROM are positively affected by gender
        • b.
          s_AROM are negatively affected by hand size
        • c.
          s_AROM are not affected by gender or hand size
        • d.
          s_AROM were not looked at in terms of gender or hand size
      • #4.
        The great majority of
        • a.
          G_AROM were equal to the G_FROM
        • b.
          G_AROM were higher than the G_FROM
        • c.
          G_AROM were lower than the G_FROM
        • d.
          G_AROM bore no relationship to the G_FROM
      • #5.
        The authors postulate that knowing average ROM and hand posture requirements for specific ADL will help guide clinical decision making
        • a.
          true
        • b.
          false
      When submitting to the HTCC for re-certification, please batch your JHT RFC certificates in groups of 3 or more to get full credit.