Advertisement

The relationship between the Patient-rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation and the common impairment measures of grip strength, pinch strength, and sensation

Published:October 16, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2014.10.003

      Abstract

      Study design

      Prospective cohort study.

      Introduction

      Grip strength, pinch strength, and sensory threshold are common evaluations used on a daily basis. Identifying how these variables relate to function for patients allows these assessments to be used for screening to identify who may benefit from surgical intervention, and provides valuable information about what impairments patients think are important with respect to functional use of their upper extremity. Therapists can use this information to focus rehabilitation programs on the most important impairments.

      Purpose

      To evaluate the relationship between the Patient-rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation (PRUNE) and impairment measures of grip strength, pinch strength, and one-point sensory threshold.

      Methods

      Data was prospectively collected from 77 patients before surgery and during regular time points for 2 years following surgery. Patients completed the PRUNE, grip and pinch strength measures, and a one-point sensory threshold evaluation. Correlations between these variables were calculated at baseline, 2 years after surgery, and for change scores during the 2-year follow up. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the contribution of the impairment variables for determining functional change.

      Results

      Grip strength showed moderate, statistically significant correlation with PRUNE scores at both baseline (r = −0.38) and at two years (r = −0.29). There was also a statistically significant correlation between one point sensory threshold for the small finger at two years (r = 0.36), but not at baseline. Change in grip strength (r = −0.28) and pinch strength (r = −0.30) both demonstrated significant correlations with PRUNE change scores. Overall, changes in grip strength, pinch strength, and sensation accounted for 20% of the variance in PRUNE changes.

      Conclusion

      Since grip strength was most highly correlated with PRUNE scores at baseline and at two years, rehabilitation programs that target grip strengthening is supported. While neither grip nor pinch strength were significant contributors to the regression when used together, each showed significant contributions to PRUNE variability when used in the model independently. Therefore, a combination of grip and pinch strengthening may be important during rehabilitation for improving functional results in patients that undergo surgical intervention for cubital tunnel syndrome.

      Level of evidence

      2b

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Hand Therapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Latinovic R.
        • Gulliford M.C.
        • Hughes R.A.
        Incidence of common compressive neuropathies in primary care.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Feb; 77: 263-265
        • Mondelli M.
        • Giannini F.
        • Ballerini M.
        • Ginanneschi F.
        • Martorelli E.
        Incidence of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow in the province of Siena (Italy).
        J Neurol Sci. 2005 Jul 15; 234: 5-10
        • Frost P.
        • Johnsen B.
        • Fuglsang-Frederiksen A.
        • Svendsen S.W.
        Lifestyle risk factors for ulnar neuropathy and ulnar neuropathy-like symptoms.
        Muscle Nerve. 2013 Oct; 48: 507-515
        • Pellieux S.
        • Fouquet B.
        • Lasfargues G.
        Ulnar nerve tunnel syndrome of the elbow and an occupational disorder. Analysis of socio-professional and physical parameters.
        Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2001 May; 44: 213-220
        • Rota E.
        • Zavaroni D.
        • Parietti L.
        • et al.
        Ulnar entrapment neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an electrodiagnostic study.
        Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Apr; 104: 73-78
        • O'Driscoll S.W.
        • Horii E.
        • Carmichael S.W.
        • Morrey B.F.
        The cubital tunnel and ulnar neuropathy.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Jul; 73: 613-617
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        • Hollstien S.B.
        • et al.
        Changes in interstitial pressure and cross-sectional area of the cubital tunnel and of the ulnar nerve with flexion of the elbow. An experimental study in human cadavera.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Apr; 80: 492-501
        • Shah C.M.
        • Calfee R.P.
        • Gelberman R.H.
        • Goldfarb C.A.
        Outcomes of rigid night splinting and activity modification in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Jun; 38: 1125-1130 e1
        • Giladi A.M.
        • Gaston R.G.
        • Haase S.C.
        • et al.
        Trend of recovery after simple decompression for treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Apr; 131: 563e-573e
        • Charles Y.P.
        • Coulet B.
        • Rouzaud J.C.
        • Daures J.P.
        • Chammas M.
        Comparative clinical outcomes of submuscular and subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2009 May-Jun; 34: 866-874
        • Chung K.C.
        Treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Nov; 33: 1625-1627
        • Macadam S.A.
        • Gandhi R.
        • Bezuhly M.
        • Lefaivre K.A.
        Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Oct; 33: 1314 e1-1341 e12
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Grewal R.
        Development and validation of the patient-rated ulnar nerve evaluation.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013; 14: 146
        • Ebersole G.C.
        • Davidge K.
        • Damiano M.
        • Mackinnon S.E.
        Validity and responsiveness of the DASH questionnaire as an outcome measure following ulnar nerve transposition for cubital tunnel syndrome.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul; 132: 81e-90e
        • Zimmerman N.B.
        • Kaye M.B.
        • Wilgis E.F.
        • Zimmerman R.M.
        • Dubin N.H.
        Are standardized patient self-reporting instruments applicable to the evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow?.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun; 18: 463-468
        • Vincent J.I.
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • King G.J.
        • Grewal R.
        Validity and sensitivity to change of patient-reported pain and disability measures for elbow pathologies.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Apr; 43: 263-274
        • MacDermid J.C.
        Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation.
        J Hand Ther. 2001 Apr-Jun; 14: 105-114
        • Shi Q.
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Santaguida P.L.
        • Kyu H.H.
        Predictors of surgical outcomes following anterior transposition of ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a systematic review.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Dec; 36: 1996-2001 e1–6
        • Shi Q.
        • MacDermid J.
        • Grewal R.
        • King G.J.
        • Faber K.
        • Miller T.A.
        Predictors of functional outcome change 18 months after anterior ulnar nerve transposition.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Feb; 93: 307-312
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Evenhuis W.
        • Louzon M.
        Inter-instrument reliability of pinch strength scores.
        J Hand Ther. 2001 Jan-Mar; 14: 36-42
        • American Society of Hand Therapists
        Clinical Assessment Recommendations.
        The Society, Chicago1992
        • Tassler P.L.
        • Dellon A.L.
        Correlation of measurements of pressure perception using the pressure-specified sensory device with electrodiagnostic testing.
        J Occup Environ Med. 1995 Jul; 37: 862-866
        • Dellon A.L.
        • Keller K.M.
        Computer-assisted quantitative sensorimotor testing in patients with carpal and cubital tunnel syndromes.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1997 May; 38: 493-502
        • Nath R.K.
        • Bowen M.E.
        • Eichhorn M.G.
        Pressure-specified sensory device versus electrodiagnostic testing in brachial plexus upper trunk injury.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010 May; 26: 235-242
        • Weber R.A.
        • Schuchmann J.A.
        • Albers J.H.
        • Ortiz J.
        A prospective blinded evaluation of nerve conduction velocity versus Pressure-Specified Sensory Testing in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2000 Sep; 45: 252-257
        • Holm S.
        A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure.
        Scand J Stat. 1979; 6: 65-70
        • Chung K.C.
        • Kotsis S.V.
        • Kim H.M.
        Predictors of functional outcomes after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Jan; 32: 76-83
        • Dellhag B.
        • Burckhardt C.S.
        Predictors of hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
        Arthritis Care Res. 1995 Mar; 8: 16-20
        • Rosen B.
        Recovery of sensory and motor function after nerve repair. A rationale for evaluation.
        J Hand Ther. 1996 Oct-Dec; 9: 315-327
        • Ekstrom H.
        • Elmstahl S.
        Pain and fractures are independently related to lower walking speed and grip strength: results from the population study “Good Ageing in Skane”.
        Acta Orthop. 2006 Dec; 77: 902-911
        • Rosenberg N.
        • Soudry M.
        • Stahl S.
        Comparison of two methods for the evaluation of treatment in medial epicondylitis: pain estimation vs grip strength measurements.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Jul; 124: 363-365
        • Palmer B.A.
        • Hughes T.B.
        Cubital tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jan; 35: 153-163
        • Huang J.H.
        • Samadani U.
        • Zager E.L.
        Ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy at the elbow: simple decompression.
        Neurosurgery. 2004 Nov; 55: 1150-1153
        • Bell-Krotoski J.
        • Weinstein S.
        • Weinstein C.
        Testing sensibility, including touch-pressure, two-point discrimination, point localization, and vibration.
        J Hand Ther. 1993 Apr-Jun; 6: 114-123
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Kramer J.F.
        • Roth J.H.
        Decision making in detecting abnormal Semmes-Weinstein monofilament thresholds in carpal tunnel syndrome.
        J Hand Ther. 1994 Jul-Sep; 7: 158-162
        • Macdermid J.C.
        • Kramer J.F.
        • McFarlane R.M.
        • Roth J.H.
        Inter-rater agreement and accuracy of clinical tests used in diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
        Work. 1997; 8: 37-44
        • Hubbard M.C.
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Kramer J.F.
        • Birmingham T.B.
        Quantitative vibration threshold testing in carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis strategies for optimizing reliability.
        J Hand Ther. 2004 Jan-Mar; 17: 24-30
        • Novak C.B.
        • Mackinnon S.E.
        • Williams J.I.
        • Kelly L.
        Establishment of reliability in the evaluation of hand sensibility.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Aug; 92: 311-322
        • Cheung D.K.
        • MacDermid J.
        • Walton D.
        • Grewal R.
        The construct validity and responsiveness of sensory tests in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Open Orthop J. 2014; 8: 100-107
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Donner A.
        • Richards R.S.
        • Roth J.H.
        Patient versus injury factors as predictors of pain and disability six months after a distal radius fracture.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Sep; 55: 849-854

      JHT Read for Credit

      Quiz: #338

      Record your answers on the Return Answer Form found on the tear-out coupon at the back of this issue or to complete online and use a credit card, go to JHTReadforCredit.com. There is only one best answer for each question.
      • #1.
        In 2013 the PRUNE was described by
        • a.
          Szekeres and King
        • b.
          Bell and Fess
        • c.
          MacDermid and Grewal
        • d.
          Osterman and Skirven
      • #2.
        Sensory testing was performed utilizing
        • a.
          one-point sensory threshold
        • b.
          moving 2 point discrimination (M2PD)
        • c.
          Semmes Weinstein monofilament testing
        • d.
          Seddon 2 point discrimination
      • #3.
        Which measure showed the highest correlation with the PRUNE
        • a.
          9 hole peg test
        • b.
          pinch strength
        • c.
          sensory testing
        • d.
          grip strength
      • #4.
        Study subjects included patients who had undergone
        • a.
          cubital tunnel decompression
        • b.
          ulnar nerve transposition
        • c.
          either cubital tunnel decompression or ulnar nerve transposition
        • d.
          no surgery
      • #5.
        The correlation between the PRUNE and the common tests of ulnar nerve function suggests good validity of the PRUNE
        • a.
          false
        • b.
          true
      When submitting to the HTCC for re-certification, please batch your JHT RFC certificates in groups of 3 or more to get full credit.