This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine which factors influence patients with rheumatoid
arthritis (RA) to choose surgical reconstruction for hand deformities. Previously,
function and pain have been the main factors influencing physicians to recommend surgery.
However, this study attempts to answer the question, “what prompts patients to seek
surgical reconstruction?” A recent study published in the Journal of Rheumatology in 2002 by Mandl et al. found that hand appearance is the factor that correlated
most highly with patient satisfaction after metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthroplasty.
This study examined how function, pain, and hand appearance (aesthetics) rank in order
of importance to rheumatoid patients choosing hand surgery for MCP joint reconstruction.
Method and Materials: The patients were part of a larger National Institute of Health-funded study evaluating
the outcomes of MCP joint arthroplasty. Three sites (two from the United States and
one from England) provided a diverse group of patients from all ethnic and socioeconomic
backgrounds. Patients who were eligible for MCP joint arthroplasty were invited to
participate in the study and chose whether to have surgery (surgical group) or no
surgery (nonsurgical group). Specific inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of RA,
age of 18–75 years, and the ability to answer questions in English. Exclusion criteria
included patients who were deemed nonsurgical candidates due to other medical conditions,
patients requiring more extensive hand reconstruction than just MCP joint arthroplasties,
and those taking antirheumatic drugs. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
was used as one of the outcome tools during the baseline evaluation. This is a hand
specific outcomes questionnaire that addresses six components including overall function,
activities of daily living (ADL's) pain, work performance, aesthetics, and patient
satisfaction. The MHQ is of particular interest as it measures areas that are important
in hand therapy and is very suited to outcome measures for the rheumatoid population.
The final sample size in this study consisted of 33 surgical patients and 28 nonsurgical
patients. Forty-nine women and 12 men participated. The mean age was 58.5 years (range
29–73 years) for surgical patients and 63.4 years (42–75 years) for nonsurgical patients.
Statistical Analysis: Baseline scores from the MHQ in the areas of pain, function, and aesthetics were
used as the predictors in logistic regression analysis of patients' choice for proceeding
with hand surgery. High scores in pain indicate more pain, high scores in function
indicate better functioning, and high scores in aesthetics indicate better hand aesthetics.
The scores from the MHQ were also examined for correlations. More pain was associated
with lower functioning and lower aesthetics, and better functioning was associated
with better aesthetics. Both age and gender were found to be associated with choosing
MCP joint arthroplasty. After controlling for age and gender, the variables of pain,
function, and aesthetics were found to be associated significantly or marginally significantly
with choosing surgery. The results of the analysis indicate that patients with lower
functioning, more pain, and lower aesthetics were more likely to choose surgery. Function
was the most significant predictor for choosing surgery followed by pain. Esthetic
consideration was not found to be statistically significant as a predictor.
Discussion: This study found that for RA patients, the most important factor in choosing to proceed
with hand surgery was decreased hand function followed by significant pain. Hand aesthetics
was not found to be a statistically significant predictor. The authors cite several
past outcomes studies of patients with RA and raise various questions about the findings.
A study of women with RA by Minnock et al. published in Rheumatology (2003;42) stated that women perceive pain as the predominant impairment in their
health status. Souter found that most RA patients rate pain relief as the most important
goal of hand surgery. Still other studies have shown improved functional ability to
be the most important reason for patients choosing hand surgery. Patients may consider
their surgery a failure if they perceive that their function has not improved according
to a study by Masey-Westropp et al. from the Journal of Hand Therapy (2003;16). These patients had improved pain and improved aesthetics. Yet objective,
functional tests such as the Jebsen-Taylor test, which simulates ADL, and grip and
pinch strength tests actually show little to no improvement after MCP joint arthroplasty.
Most patients do, however, experience pain relief and improved hand appearance; these
two variables may influence patients' overall satisfaction after surgery and lead
them to a perceived improved functional status.
Conclusion: This study is important because it recommends that hand surgeons assess and address
their patients' expectations prior to surgery. The surgeon needs to make the patient
understand the expected outcome of the proposed surgery and help them develop realistic
goals. Also, the patient needs to be informed of the necessary rehabilitation period
following the surgery to achieve those goals. The authors suggest periodic follow-up
evaluations to determine whether goals and expectations are being met.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Hand TherapyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Publication history
Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM, Burke FD, Wilgis EFS. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006;31A:289–93.
Footnotes
Abstracts from the Literature editor is Greg Hritzo, MPT CHT [email protected]
Identification
Copyright
© 2006 Hanley & Belfus. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.