Management of stiffness of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the finger
remains a controversial problem. Despite the large number of papers describing the
different approaches in releasing flexion and extension contractures in PIP joints,
only two studies actually support their conclusions with statistical analyses. The
aim of this study was twofold. The first goal was to statistically analyze the results
of extensor tenolysis with dorsal capsulotomy for PIP joints in extension contractures.
Secondly, the gain in range of motion (ROM) in the PIP joint following extensor tenolysis
and dorsal capsulotomy was compared with that found in the literature.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Hand TherapyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Publication history
Short Description: Management of stiffness of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the finger remains a controversial problem. Despite the large number of papers describing the different approaches in releasing flexion and extension contractures in PIP joints, only two studies actually support their conclusions with statistical analyses.
Identification
Copyright
© 2006 Hanley & Belfus. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
