Journal of Hand Therapy
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 18-30, January 2010

Hand Therapist Management of the Lateral Epicondylosis: A Survey of Expert Opinion and Practice Patterns

  • Joy C. MacDermid, BScPT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests to Joy C. MacDermid, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, IAHS, 1400 Main Street West, 4th floor, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada.

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Clinical Research Lab, Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Center, London, Ontario, Canada

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Blaser's Physiotherapy Clinic, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

East End Community Health Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

published online 03 December 2009.

Abstract 

Lateral epicondylosis (LE) is a common condition. Knowledge on practice patterns underlies identification of knowledge to practice gaps. The purpose was to determine the practice patterns and beliefs of hand therapists in managing LE. The study design used was a descriptive survey. A survey of Certified Hand Therapists and members of the American Society of Hand Therapists was conducted (n=693). Questions were framed around frequency and perceived effectiveness of interventions, examination techniques, outcome measures, and prognostic factors. More than 80% of therapists use education/activity modification, home exercise, LE orthoses, and stretching for both the acute and chronic LE. Therapists perceive education, orthoses and home exercise are the most effective for acute cases, whereas in chronic cases, orthoses dropped to ninth in ranked perceived effectiveness. Grip strength (80%) and numeric pain rating (71%) were the most commonly used outcome measures. Most (>70%) therapists perceived occupation and duration of symptoms are prognostic in terms of resolution of symptoms, whereas compliance with exercise (78%) and work factors are important for return to work. Therapists rely on impairment measures to evaluate hand therapy outcomes in patients with LE. Hand therapists are aligned with a number of recommendations from the available systematic reviews, although the use of outcome measures and optimal definition of education and exercise exhibit evidence to practice gaps. Level of evidence: Level 5.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by a New Investigator Award, Canadian Institutes of Health Research. This work was funded by The American Society of Hand Therapists.

PII: S0894-1130(09)00129-X

doi:10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.009

Journal of Hand Therapy
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 18-30, January 2010