« Previous
Next »
Journal of Hand Therapy
Volume 21, Issue 2
, Pages 150-159
, April 2008
Combat Casualty Hand Burns: Evaluating Impairment and Disability during Recovery
References
- Burn support for operation Iraqi freedom and related operations. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005;26:151–161
- Chapman TT, Richard RL, Hedman TL, et al. Military return to duty and civilian return to work factors following burns with focus on the hand and literature review. J Burn Care Research. 2008, in press.
- . Treatment of 1,963 burned patients at 106th general hospital, Yokohama, Japan. J Trauma. 1970;10:386–392
- . Burns of the Upper Extremity. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1976;
- The acutely burned hand: management and outcome based on a ten-year experience with 1047 acute hand burns. J Trauma. 1995;38:406–411
- . Prospective outcome analysis of a protocol for the surgical and rehabilitative management of burns to the hands. J Amer Soc Plas Surg. 1997;100:1442–1451
- . The burned hand: optimizing long-term outcomes with a standardized approach to acute and subacute care. Clin Plast Surg. 2005;32:515–527
- . Outcome measures in burn care: is mortality dead?. Burns. 2004;30:761–771
- . Effective hand function assessment after burn injuries. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2004;25:134–139
- . Functional outcomes for the patient with burn injuries. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996;17:362–368
- . Outcome Measurement in the Upper Extremity. 5th ed.. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2002;
- . Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 5th ed.. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2001;
- Impairment after burns: a two-center, prospective report. Burns. 2003;29:671–675
- . Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:666–673
- . The London handicap scale: a re-evaluation of its validity using standard scoring and simple summation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2000;68:365–367
- . Outcome of hand trauma: the hand injury severity scoring system (HISS) and subsequent impairment and disability. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2003;28B:295–299
- . Impairment, time out of school, and time off from work after burns. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;79:927–934
- . Dexter®: a tool to facilitate impairment ratings. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2001;22:397–400
- Computer-assisted evaluation of hand and arm function after thermal injury. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996;17:176–180
- . Improving the evaluation of permanent impairment. JAMA. 2000;283:532–533
- . The use of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire in rehabilitation after acute traumatic hand injuries. J Hand Ther. 2007;20:49–56
- . Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther. 2004;17:18–23
- . Outcome assessment in hand surgery and hand therapy: an update. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:63–67
- . Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:128–142
- . Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2000;25:330–334
- . Applying evidence on outcome measures to hand therapy practice. J Hand Ther. 2004;17:165–173
- . Impairment and disability after severe hand injuries with multiple phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg. 2007;32A:91–95
- . The DASH Outcome Measure: A User's Manual. Toronto: Ontario: Institute for Work & Health; 1999;
- . A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:68–76
- . Measurement of health outcomes following tendon and nerve repair. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:297–312
Disclaimer: The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense. The brand names of any commercial devices cited are for illustrative purposes and do not imply endorsement by the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense. The authors have no financial interest in any commercial device herein cited.
PII: S0894-1130(07)00249-9
doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.12.003
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Hand Therapy
Volume 21, Issue 2
, Pages 150-159
, April 2008
