Journal of Hand Therapy
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 20-28, January 2007

New Carpal Ligament Traction Device for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Unresponsive to Conservative Therapy

  • Julian Sosner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence and reprint requests to Julian Sosner, MD, Faculty Practice, 36 Seventh Avenue, Suite 411, New York, NY 10011

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers of New York, Manhattan, New York, USA

Clinical Rehabilitation Medicine, New York Medical College, New York, USA

Abstract 

This study evaluated the treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction of a new hand traction device called C-TRAC in patients that failed conservative therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patients were diagnosed with electromyography and nerve conduction studies. Only patients with a positive Phalens test and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of more than 5/10 were eligible for the study. The patients had tried nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), resting hand splint during the night, acupuncture, and hand therapy for a minimum of four months. To test C-TRAC as the sole treatment for CTS, patients included in the study stopped all other forms of therapy (NSAIDS, hand therapy, acupuncture, massage, manipulations, and steroid injections). A group of 19 patients used C-TRAC hand traction device for 5 minutes three times daily for four weeks. After the four-week period the device was used as needed. The patients were followed up weekly for four weeks, then at seven months. VAS was used to assess pain, tingling, and numbness in the treated hand. The number of times patients woke up at night and satisfaction with the use of the device were also evaluated. The average VAS for pain decreased from 8.53 to 1.05. The average tingling decreased from 8.15 to 0.95. The average numbness decreased from 8.47 to 0.95. The average number of times patients woke up per night because of CTS symptoms decreased from 3.05 to 0.10. Patients showed significant improvement at four weeks and results were maintained at seven months follow-up. Fifteen patients (79%) rated their treatment as excellent and four (21%) as good and none (0%) as fair or poor. Clinical relevance: This device is very effective and well tolerated in treatment of CTS in patients that failed conservative therapy.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The author has a commercial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

PII: S0894-1130(06)00223-7

doi:10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.001

Journal of Hand Therapy
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 20-28, January 2007